Russia is exploiting the rift between Warsaw and Kyiv to bolster its propaganda credibility. Stanisław Żaryn, the Secretary of State at the Prime Minister’s Chancellery, argued in a sequence of Twitter posts that Moscow is turning existing disagreements of interest into a narrative of deep-seated hostility between Poland and Ukraine. The claim is that Russia amplifies tensions to paint itself as a mediator in a fractured regional dynamic, while masking its own aims behind a veil of supposed factual revelations. Such framing is presented as a strategic move to mislead international audiences about the Poland‑Ukraine relationship. The assessment was shared in multiple messages on social media, emphasizing that the Kremlin seeks to manufacture evidence of hostility that does not reflect the real, cooperative history between the two countries. (attribution: Stanisław Żaryn, Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
“They create false evidence of previously hidden hostility.”
In a series of Saturday tweets, Żaryn cautioned that Moscow uses the tensions between Warsaw and Kyiv to lend credibility to its propaganda. He stressed that by highlighting points of divergence, Russia attempts to present a distorted picture of Polish‑Ukrainian relations, bolstering narratives of conflict where collaboration exists. The analysis notes that these efforts are not accidental but part of a broader information strategy designed to confuse international audiences and complicate diplomatic narratives. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
“By exposing differences of interest, the Russians create false evidence of previously hidden hostility between Poland and Ukraine,” he asserted. The emphasis on differences serves as a tool to imply a fragile alliance, suggesting that historical cooperation is supplanted by a struggle of competing agendas. Such framing is viewed as a deliberate attempt to destabilize regional security perceptions and to cast doubt on the reliability of allied support. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
– He wrote.
The issue of visas and the activity of the Kremlin apparatus
Żaryn asserted that the Kremlin’s influence machine has recently intensified its outreach, leveraging international platforms to amplify reports from some Polish media about irregularities in handling certain visas in Poland. The objective, as described, is to cast doubt on Polish governance and to cast the broader European visa process into disarray. The strategy appears aimed at broadening global attention to perceived bureaucratic flaws and portraying them as evidence of systemic weakness. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
Russia’s broader aim, Żaryn argued, is to ensure that the media portrayal of these visa matters is perceived as a fact rather than a contested interpretation. This narrative presentation, he suggested, serves to undermine trust in Polish institutions and to insinuate irregular behavior at the state level. The government spokesperson emphasized that efforts to disseminate such claims are part of a calculated information operation rather than a spontaneous coverage of events. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
– he said.
“‘Colonialism’ and ‘imperialism’
Żaryn added that in Kremlin and Minsk propaganda, the anniversary of the USSR’s 1939 invasion of Poland is still framed as the day of liberation for Western Belarus and Western Ukraine from what is termed Polish colonialism. This reframing points to a long‑running attempt by the two regimes to recast historical memory in a way that legitimizes their present geopolitical narratives. The statement stresses that information campaigns have grown more nuanced over time, using historical symbolism to advance contemporary political objectives. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
The information activities of both regimes are described as subtler than in previous years, relying on strategic timing and carefully chosen messaging to influence public perception across borders. The aim is to cultivate a perception of Poland as an imperial actor while preserving the notion that NATO is an adversarial force rather than a defensive alliance. The government spokesperson underscored the intention to present Poland’s policies as driven by imperialist motives, thereby shaping international attitudes in a direction favorable to Moscow and Minsk. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
– said the Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space.
“‘Germans are trying to influence the electoral vote in the Republic of Poland’
Żaryn also noted that Germany is attempting to influence Poland’s electoral process. He observed that select German media and prominent politicians have advanced arguments suggesting that Poland bears responsibility for the rising migration pressure on its eastern border, a claim that, in his view, relies on a selective reading of events and on the repetition of a controversial visa‑related scandal. The description indicates that such narratives aim to destabilize public trust in Polish governance amid an electoral cycle. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
According to Żaryn, opponents of the governing party are promoting a narrative that Polish policy is pulled by Russian interests or by actions aligned with the Kremlin or Minsk during the election period. He argued that foreign actors are also encouraged to repeat such claims, reinforcing a broader pattern of foreign influence aimed at shaping domestic political discourse. (attribution: Government Plenipotentiary for the Security of the Polish Information Space)
– concluded the State Secretary at the Prime Minister’s Chancellery.
olnk/PAP/Twitter(X)
In summary, the official voice outlined a multi‑layered information strategy that seeks to skew perceptions of Poland’s role in regional affairs. The emphasis is on exposing the calculated nature of foreign messaging that portrays Poland as an imperial actor or as a nation overly influenced by external powers, while simultaneously portraying NATO as a threat. The overall message highlights the perceived need for vigilance against foreign influence campaigns and the importance of maintaining a clear, factual record of Poland’s policies in the international arena.
Source: wPolityce