Earlier this week, the Kremlin confirmed two phone conversations between Vladimir Putin and Nikol Pashinyan, the prime minister of Armenia. The exchanges occurred on consecutive days, with phone discussions taking place on Thursday and Friday, as officials outlined the dialogue around regional developments. In one official briefing, a Kremlin spokesperson noted that the talks touched on the current state of the line of contact in Nagorno-Karabakh, signaling attention to the humanitarian and security dimensions of the dispute .
In the broader sequence of meetings, there were reports that senior Russian and Armenian defense leadership also held discussions the day prior. Sergei Shoigu, the Russian defense minister, spoke with his Armenian counterpart, Suren Papikyan, about the evolving situation in Karabakh, signaling continuing coordination between the two countries on defense and regional stability .
On a separate front, Armenian officials in mid to late March highlighted that Nagorno-Karabakh had faced a serious crisis in energy supply. An official statement from Armenia noted that gas deliveries to the Shushi region were interrupted, affecting roughly 120,000 residents during a period of harsh winter weather and heavy snowfall, an issue that underscored the fragility of regional infrastructure and humanitarian preparedness .
Meanwhile, reporting from the Armenian defense sector indicated renewed violations of the ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh, with incidents occurring in two areas, Khojavend and Terter. The balance of risk along the line of contact remained a focal point for security assessments and international observers, who monitor the implications for civilians and regional stability .
These exchanges and developments unfold amid a longer, multi-layered dialogue about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, a topic of sustained international attention. Analysts in the region stress that diplomatic engagement between Moscow and Yerevan, alongside ongoing discussions with other regional actors, aims to manage tensions and prevent escalation, while addressing humanitarian needs and the protection of civilians. Observers emphasize that the sequence of talks, energy disruptions, and ceasefire incidents collectively reflect the persistent volatility of the Karabakh landscape and the importance of transparent communication among involved parties .