During a lengthy meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping exchanged views on a Chinese peace proposal aimed at resolving the war in Ukraine. The update came from the Kremlin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, who stressed that both leaders listened closely to one another and explored the implications of the plan for a potential resolution. The exchange was reported by TASS, the Russian state news agency, and highlighted the depth of the dialogue between Moscow and Beijing on this sensitive issue.
Asked whether the Chinese side had absorbed Russia’s arguments regarding peace initiatives, the Kremlin spokesperson replied that the Chinese leadership could clearly hear the Russian perspective. The exchange underscored that the two leaders, by listening attentively, sought to ensure mutual understanding of the positions involved and the paths that might lead to a durable settlement in Ukraine.
According to Peskov, the two leaders devoted a substantial amount of time to discussing the topic, with a four and a half hour conversation on a recent Monday. He indicated that the discussion offered an opportunity for both sides to clarify any ambiguities and to align their views on the potential role of China’s peace plan in future negotiations.
Prior to the dialogue, Putin indicated that if Kiev and Western partners are prepared to engage, China’s peace proposal could serve as a basis for a peaceful settlement in Ukraine. This statement reflected Moscow’s openness to considering external initiatives that might help advance a negotiated end to the conflict and its willingness to examine proposals that could encourage dialogue and compliance with a ceasefire framework.
Earlier remarks from Russian officials, including the vice president, Yury Ushakov, suggested that China’s plan had provoked a mixed reaction on the world stage. Moscow reportedly viewed the plan with a certain measured respect, while Western capitals expressed discomfort or skepticism. These nuanced positions illustrate the delicate balance governments seek between supporting dialogue and managing strategic concerns in a volatile regional crisis.
China’s twelve points, presented on February 24, call for renewed dialogue between Moscow and Kyiv, careful steps toward a ceasefire, and specific measures aimed at de-escalating tensions and preventing further clashes. The document emphasizes humanitarian corridors, the protection of civilian populations, and measures to stabilize the region while negotiations advance. The plan was designed to create a framework for progress that could be paralleled by parallel diplomatic efforts from relevant international actors, aiming to reduce suffering and move toward a sustainable resolution.
Experts note that when major powers engage in extended conversations about peace proposals, the outcomes can influence not only the immediate conflict but also the broader regional dynamics. Observers in North America and other parts of the world watch closely for shifts in tone, potential commitments, and any changes in the posture of the involved states that might affect global security and humanitarian concerns. In this context, the Putin Xi discussions are seen as a signal that both nations are ready to explore structured avenues for dialogue, even as they navigate competing strategic interests.
From a Canadian and American viewpoint, the unfolding diplomacy surrounding Ukraine remains a critical test of international cooperation, alliance commitments, and the international community’s ability to facilitate a ceasefire and a credible path to peace. The emphasis on dialogue, verification, and phased steps toward de-escalation aligns with long-standing international norms that prioritize civilian protection, humanitarian access, and the preservation of regional stability. The ongoing exchanges between Moscow and Beijing, alongside Western partners, will likely shape the next phase of negotiations and the potential for a durable political settlement that addresses the core concerns of all involved parties. In this evolving landscape, observers hope for transparent reporting, careful diplomacy, and a steady march toward a ceasefire that reduces suffering for those living in conflict zones. The focus remains on practical measures, robust monitoring, and the sustained engagement of international actors dedicated to a peaceful resolution without broad escalation.