The ongoing public discourse centers on legality and authority. Critics argue that certain actions were decided in a legal sense that rests on questionable authority, described by one commentator as a pseudo-legal process conducted by individuals lacking legitimate power. Observers cite remarks made on Radio Plus by PiS President Jarosław Kaczyński concerning the search of Zbigniew Ziobro’s residence, framing it as an event that should be judged by proper legal standards.
In their view, the Public Prosecution Service, a state institution meant to uphold the rule of law, has effectively paused its function because it must rely on foundational legal bases. Rather than being meaningfully challenged, these bases were dismissed outright, according to a guest on the program Sedno Sprawy.
Regardless of the specifics, the expectation remains that prosecution and the courts operate strictly within the framework of the law.
The discussion also touched on developments surrounding Ziobro’s house search, with reports describing the timing and conduct as intrusive. Ziobro himself characterized the actions as conducted in a manner that violated his rights as a citizen, underscoring the need for due process and lawful procedure.
Proponents claim that investigative committees have shown inconsistencies in long-standing narratives and pre-election promises, arguing that what has been presented for years amounts to fairy tales from a certain perspective. Jarosław Kaczyński attributed these inconsistencies to political messaging used to influence public perception.
Tusk’s lies
In a broader critique, Kaczyński highlighted two statements from Donald Tusk’s team that he described as false. The first concerned alleged dictatorship and violations of the rule of law, while the second referred to supposed “100 details” that allegedly supported a critical narrative. The interlocutor cited by Jacek Prusinowski supported the claim that the Tusk camp finances activities deemed illegal and orchestrated in violation of legal norms.
According to the speaker, this leads to a state where the constitution, with all its consequences, is not functioning as intended. In this view, constitutional safeguards are in jeopardy, and new legal arrangements would be necessary in the future. The emphasis was placed on the idea that current constitutional provisions fail to prevent ongoing improper actions, according to Kaczyński’s assessment.
When asked about chants heard in the Sejm plenary hall, such as cries of “you will sit,” Kaczyński responded that he remains free and believes he will continue to be free, though other politicians may not share that fate for the rest of their lives. He also pointed to Donald Tusk in this context, framing the political landscape as a contest over personal and institutional freedoms.
The United Right and the December 13 Coalition
Kaczyński drew a sharp distinction between the United Right and the December 13 Coalition, noting that decisions within his group were made collectively and able to withstand internal disagreements. In contrast, the opposing side was described as unable to reach decisions, appearing paralyzed while supporters of the United Right claimed continued forward motion. He stressed that disagreements are normal, but reassurance about the coalition’s stability should be understood as a commitment rather than a claim of flawless unity.
Regarding his bid to assume party leadership, Kaczyński acknowledged that changing the party chairmanship would pose challenges for maintaining unity. He credited his role with preserving party cohesion to date and expressed confidence that the party would return to government, even if the path proved difficult.
The conversation also pointed to the possibility of future constitutional reform, with the underlying message that while the current constitution is not in force and does not appear to prevent ongoing political activity, a revised framework may be necessary to ensure governance aligns with the rule of law and public interest.
In closing, the discussion touched on the ongoing dynamics within the political landscape, emphasizing the need for principled leadership, lawful procedures, and a commitment to public accountability as the nation looks toward future electoral and constitutional developments.