The discussion centers on claims that the Weimar Triangle could try to substitute for the current agreements with the United States. Critics suggest that such a move might push the United States to scale back engagements, potentially replacing existing contracts with Korea with more costly and less effective weapons from Germany and France. This analysis follows the visit by a prominent European political figure to Paris and Berlin and reflects concerns about strategic alignments in the region.
Speculation has arisen about whether the European politician could pursue the presidency of the European Commission. An initial report suggested that a governing party seeks the support of a regional Franco-Bavian alliance for a possible candidacy. The discussion sparked questions about how the candidacy would be received within the broader European political landscape.
Reports have urged readers to view the news cautiously, characterizing some assessments as exaggerated or distorted. In subsequent remarks, the politician indicated that there is a proposal from the governing party for him to act as a leading candidate within a particular political group, though this depends on consent from all member parties within that faction.
Notes from a guest editor mention that there is limited likelihood of the proposed candidate securing the backing of the European Parliament to achieve the role of head of the European Commission. For this to be viable, it would need the backing of the largest political group in the Parliament, and the referenced faction is not currently the largest. This point was emphasized by the speaker.
There is a stance within the faction that the European Parliament should not nominate the President of the European Commission. Instead, the appointment should come from the European Council, with parliamentary approval following thereafter, a view highlighted in the discussion.
tkwl/Television in Poland