Prof. Michał Bilewicz, a sociologist and social psychologist affiliated with the Center for Research on Prejudice at the University of Warsaw, openly expressed admiration for Agnieszka Holland’s provocative film. He described it as a powerful work that resonated with a strong sense of national sentiment.
The writer returned from the cinema with a sense of having witnessed something grand and emotionally charged, a film that touched on themes of patriotism and moral reflection in a way that lingered after the screening.
Holland herself drew attention to the discussion surrounding the film, noting the conversation it sparked about national identity and memory. This moment became another example of how state narratives can attempt to frame a discussion as a moral panic around art that many see as important for public education and reflection.
– the shared sentiment underscored by observers and critics alike. It is worth noting that Bilewicz has previously engaged in public discourse that questioned how Poles are portrayed in the context of wartime acts of resistance. He has highlighted that helping Jews during the Second World War carried severe risks, including punishment for the helper and for their families.
“It’s a great movie with a great message.”
In his reflections, Bilewicz drew comparisons between a controversial portrayal of the Netherlands and historically significant efforts by individuals such as the Ulma family and Irena Sendler, who are remembered for their work to protect Jewish lives during the war.
The conversation emphasized the importance of examining the lives of people like the Ulmas, Sendler, and Oskar Schindler. Bilewicz suggested that cinema can elevate stories of moral courage shown in extreme circumstances, and he described the film as a work with a meaningful and important message.
– his remarks highlighted how cinema can intersect with history to illuminate acts of bravery under pressure, while also inviting debate about how such narratives are presented and received.
As observed, Bilewicz’s commentary links the theme of unauthorised immigration into Poland with historical memories of wartime heroism. The juxtaposition has provoked strong reactions and some provocative comparisons, including mentions of the Ulma family that have stirred controversy among viewers and commentators.
tkwl/TOK FM
READ ALSO:
– Insolence! Holland: My film was made out of love for Poland. There is debate about whether this stance provides fuel for political parties, and whether there should be a single story about border realities
– Worth reading! A strong online response after viewing the Dutch film, with some critics calling certain scenes distasteful or simplistic
– He urged Poland to consider wartime memories from different angles, a stance that has sparked further discussion about national memory and reconciliation
Source: wPolityce