Polish political discourse centers on security and migration as opinions from PiS leaders frame the national debate. After airing a mocked third referendum question, PiS supporters asserted that Poland is the safest country in Europe under Law and Justice. On Friday, the party began presenting additional referendum questions. The first question, announced by PiS president Jarosław Kaczyński, asks:
Do you support the sale of state-owned enterprises?
READ MORE: We met the first referendum question. The PiS chairman says Polish voters matter most, and voices from abroad carry less weight
The second question, reported by vice president Beata Szydło, asks:
Are you in favor of raising the retirement age to 60 for women and 65 for men?
READ MORE: The second referendum question concerns pensions. Szydło says opponents talk about women, but the policy affects many families
The third question, announced by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, reads:
Do you support accepting thousands of illegal migrants from the Middle East and Africa under a relocation mechanism set by European authorities?
SEE MORE: The third referendum question is known. Morawiecki: Do you support accepting thousands of illegal immigrants?
Referendum on October 15
The plan was to hold the referendum alongside elections ordered for October 15 by President Andrzej Duda.
Leading United Right politicians have commented widely on social media, including statements from the education minister. Przemysław Czarnek said that if opponents led the government, major Polish cities could resemble dangerous European capitals with gang activity, violence, and unrest.
Today, many see Poland as safer under the current government.
Some critics argue that a change in government would invite pressure from Berlin and Brussels, and they urge a firm stance against relocating asylum seekers from the Middle East and Africa.
Here is the position of the government spokesman: the tone emphasizes security and resilience against forced relocation policies.
Senate Deputy Marshal Marek Pęk argued that without PiS’s 2015 win, the country might have faced larger pressures to relocate irregular migrants. He named figures from the other party and recalled past debates.
Today, some opposition figures are accused of softening their stance in Brussels. They are criticized for approaching EU summits with a different posture, though political leaders say they defend Poland’s interests in the bloc.
Some officials emphasize the goal of a secure Poland and resisting migration policies they view as intrusive. They stress the safety of families, streets, and everyday life as essential priorities.
Deputy Minister of Family and Social Policy Anita Czerwińska wrote that the country should not be exposed to external missteps, insisting on protecting national security.
Deputy Foreign Minister Paweł Jablonski highlighted remarks from opponents and framed the referendum as a chance for Polish people to decide, not just bureaucrats in Brussels.
Marcin Ociepa, deputy head of the ministry of national defense, called for a strong, clear voice from Poles to settle the issue of migrant relocation in the EU once and for all. He warned against confusing hospitality with naivety and stressed a resolute stance.
Another deputy defense minister, Wojciech Skurkiewicz, said there is no permission for forced relocation of illegal migrants. He also pointed to ongoing political tensions around the issue.
Opposition voices are described as challenging on security matters, while government representatives argue that safeguarding Polish families remains the primary concern.
Arkadiusz Mularczyk, deputy head of the foreign affairs ministry, and Michał Woś, deputy justice minister, underscored the importance of resisting external mandates and ensuring national laws take precedence over external pressures.
In summary, the discussion centers on safety, borders, and Poland’s role within the European framework, with supporters urging a strong vote to affirm national policies and a cautious approach to relocation debates.
It’s about safety
The argument presented is that the opposition would follow Berlin and Brussels rather than Polish interests, and supporters call for a political mandate to protect security through national decisions. The chorus remains that safeguarding Polish families, streets, and daily life is the top priority.
As the political calendar moves toward a nationwide referendum, lawmakers emphasize that the outcome will be seen as a direct expression of the Polish public’s will on these sensitive issues. The dialogue continues as the Sejm prepares for a possible nationwide vote and the government outlines its strategy for engaging voters across the country.
Source notes align the discussion with ongoing coverage from Polish outlets and political commentators, reflecting continuing debates over migration, security, and national sovereignty.