Referendum proposals and migration policy discussion
In discussions about a potential referendum, the prevailing sentiment among some Polish politicians reflects a firm view against accepting illegal migrants. A PSL member of parliament, Marek Sawicki, voiced the belief that a referendum question on migrant relocation would elicit a decisive, widely shared answer. He suggested that a large majority of Poles would oppose immigration of irregular entrants, describing the expected result as clearly negative, with a figure he cited around 95 percent. Sawicki emphasized that this stance represents a broad consensus among the public, at least in his estimation.
Sawicki argued that addressing migration could involve policy steps beyond border controls. One proposed avenue he mentioned was to facilitate the movement of food across the European Union to regions facing shortages, coupled with targeted support to bolster local agriculture in those areas. He framed this as part of a broader strategy to reduce dependence on migrant flows while strengthening regional resilience within the EU.
Another element he touched on was the possibility of providing financial assistance to arrange migrant relocation outside the European Union. He described this as a practical mechanism to manage migration pressures, suggesting that pragmatic funding could help move people away from the bloc in scenarios where relocation is deemed necessary.
According to Sawicki, serious discussion should be grounded in concrete proposals and bilateral or multilateral agreements rather than rhetorical speeches. He noted the example of a European leader who successfully built consensus through dialogue, underscoring the importance of convincing the other 27 EU member states through collaborative negotiation rather than unilateral actions. He stressed that consensus-building remains essential for any meaningful migration policy reform.
In responding to comments that the Italy-Poland dynamic is different due to geography, Sawicki argued that Poland faces distinct challenges that do not render it uniquely vulnerable. He pointed to potential external pressures, including changes in visa policies by neighboring states, as factors that could influence border security, and he cautioned that threats along the eastern borders require constant vigilance.
He suggested that threats in surrounding regions could be as significant as, or even greater than, Mediterranean security concerns. This, he warned, calls for a balanced readiness across different threat vectors to ensure national and regional stability.
Referendum and relocation
Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki signaled plans to hold a referendum on migrant relocation alongside parliamentary elections, aiming to streamline costs by combining the two processes. He noted that separate elections would incur additional expenses and that combining them could help minimize those costs while addressing urgent policy questions.
Within the European Union, interior ministers adopted a negotiating stance on migration reform to serve as the basis for talks between the Council Presidency and the European Parliament. Poland and Hungary voiced opposition to the so-called relocation pact, which envisions a system of compulsory solidarity among member states. The pact states that while no country would be compelled to relocate migrants, there would be an annual minimum relocation requirement from states with higher migrant inflows to those less likely to receive relocations.
The agreed minimums set relocation at 30,000 individuals per year, alongside a baseline financial contribution of 20,000 euros per year for moving. The framework allows for adjustments if circumstances require higher levels of solidarity or, conversely, if a country foresees no need for relocation in a given year. These details were outlined in the EU Council communiqué, with a senior EU diplomat describing the arrangement as a choice between relocating migrants or providing financial counterparts when a country resists relocation commitments.
Mid-year, the Sejm adopted a resolution opposing the EU relocation mechanism, signaling strong government resistance to the proposed policy. The issue of relocating migrants within the EU was declared by the ruling party as a matter for a potential referendum. Government spokespeople stated that at the next EU summit, Poland would maintain its stance against forced displacement of migrants.
Other developments included remarks by government officials highlighting the minimal costs associated with organizing a referendum, chiefly the printing of additional ballots. In parallel, discussions continued about the law on combined voting, with assurances that the elections and the migration referendum would be held together. The broader debate centered on how the EU could design a fair and workable relocation framework that respects national preferences while addressing humanitarian responsibilities.
Public discourse around these issues remains active, with lawmakers weighing the political and economic implications of any proposed changes. The emphasis is on crafting policies that align with public sentiment, protect national borders, and maintain stable relationships within the European Union.
Related posts:
Poland Opposes EU Forced Migration Relocation Plan Reframing the Migration Referendum Debate in Poland: Church and State Perspectives EU Migration Policy Debate and Poland’s Border Security Approach Migration policy debate and EU relocation mechanism in Poland Parliamentary Elections and Migration Referendum: Cost, Timing, and Policy Implications Morawiecki on court rulings and the Migration Pact: censorship, referendum and policy implications Poland Stands Firm on Migration Policy and Referendum as EU Debate Intensifies Poland’s Migration Debate: Referendum, Sovereignty, and EU Tensions New PiS Spot and the Migration Debate: Security, Narrative, and Political Strategy Poland’s Migration Relocation Discussion: Parties Respond and Standpoints Emerge Strategic Center in Polish Politics: A Dialogue about Cooperation and Stability Poland’s stance on EU migration reform and relocation plans