A well-known truth in political life is that a rational republic cannot emerge from endless disputes and quarrels. In the recent elections, the Third Way camp carried a slogan: enough arguing, move on. The expectation is that the rational center of Polish politics would grow stronger to help calm tensions, a sentiment echoed by a senior PSL parliamentary figure who also serves as a marshal appointed by President Andrzej Duda in an interview with wPolityce.pl.
READ ALSO:
The President has decided. Marek Sawicki will become the senior marshal. He is regarded as a figure of dialogue and collaboration.
Sawicki expressed surprise at the appointment and described his duty as guiding Sejm work in line with the Constitution and parliamentary custom.
During the discussion, the President highlighted Sawicki’s extensive parliamentary experience and his reputation for dialogue as reasons for the choice. Sawicki noted that he accepted the role and would oversee the proceedings in a manner consistent with constitutional norms, ensuring a smooth start to the new term.
Earlier, a prominent newspaper warned that the senior marshal could, in theory, attempt to stall the Sejm after the swearing-in, effectively using a filibuster. Sawicki acknowledged that such tactics would not be expected from him and stated his commitment to cooperation with the government and constitutional processes.
Asked whether there were any hidden motives behind the President’s decision, Sawicki declined to speculate and affirmed faith in the President’s intentions.
Attention turned to the possibility of alliances, with talk about a coalition within Polish affairs that would include PSL and other groups. Sawicki expressed belief that coalitions should reflect what everyone can agree on, not what everyone argues against. He emphasized the importance of compromise on issues such as women’s rights, while noting that this did not require abandoning the country’s traditional Christian roots.
In discussing potential coalition agreements, Sawicki indicated that such accords should align with shared principles rather than ideological concessions and stressed that the country must remain a free, democratic space where people may advocate their positions without compromising the core values they share.
Regarding proposals for a quick session of the Sejm after the Prime Minister’s appointment, Sawicki said that such steps fall outside his direct remit as a politician. He could only assess, propose, and comment, but did not claim certainty about any particular move. When asked whether shortening the Prime Minister’s tenure could help reduce political friction, he called it a humane and compassionate idea, while acknowledging that legal disputes could accompany such a decision.
If a move were pursued, it might speed up the opposition’s timeline to form a government, yet it would almost certainly trigger intense legal debate about its legality. Sawicki restated his personal stance: mercy and relief for those in government difficulties are meaningful, but the decision rests with the Prime Minister, who could choose to accept or refuse such a mission.
On the question of possible PSL cooperation with the ruling party in the future, Sawicki remained hopeful that collaboration is possible in principle. He suggested that the eventual form of any cooperation would depend on two parties, not just one, and noted signals from the government side showing a willingness to discuss engagement with PSL again after years of tension.
In reflecting on the broader political landscape, Sawicki pointed out that it is natural for people to wish for a constructive path forward. He argued that mutual cooperation requires a shared willingness to support stable governance, and that the PSL would not back policies that contradict its core principles. He also commented on the current political environment, noting that some colleagues in other factions may not share the same outlook, but this should not define the PSL’s approach to coalition-building.
Ultimately, Sawicki stressed that dialogue and cooperation remain possible if both sides approach talks with a spirit of respect and a clear eye on the nation’s interests. The door to constructive engagement is open, and the path forward, while not yet defined, centers on balancing values with practical governance.
The interview reflected a careful assessment of how cooperation, constitutional compliance, and the future direction of policy could shape Poland’s political scene in the coming term, with an emphasis on mercy, stability, and responsible leadership.