Polish Referendum and the Political Stakes Highlighted by Deputy Justice Minister
According to Sebastian Kaleta, the deputy justice minister, the fear surrounding the referendum among opposition figures stems from a concern that Donald Tusk and his inner circle are not ready to disclose their full plans to the Polish people. Kaleta also pointed to what he described as a wariness among EU elites toward Poland’s use of direct democracy.
The analysis continues to frame the referendum as a critical moment for accountability. Kaleta argued that the opposition’s apprehension is driven by the belief that Poles might vote against the proposed agenda. He described the referendum as a litmus test for truthfulness in the campaign and suggested that some political actors want to conceal their real intentions until after the election. In Kaleta’s view, the opposition fears revealing uncomfortable truths about policy changes, including potential adjustments to retirement age and positions on migration policy.
Kaleta, speaking in an interview with wPolsce.pl, asserted that the opposition would prefer not to allow a referendum because it would force them to confront the electorate with clear, unambiguous choices.
Beyond national politics, Kaleta argued that the stance of opposition leaders underscores a broader anxiety about exposing political promises. He recalled an archival statement from Donald Tusk made during a previous referendum campaign that targeted the mayor of Warsaw, Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz. Kaleta paraphrased Tusk as saying that abstaining in a referendum is in itself a vote, implying that the outcome would reflect voters who chose not to participate. Kaleta interpreted this as a signal that some opposition figures would rather not publicly endorse certain positions, fearing political repercussions and the fear among their own supporters about issues such as immigration and retirement policy.
Kaleta contended that such concerns extend to the European Union, which he described as anxious about the potential precedent set by Poland’s commitment to direct democracy. He claimed that EU institutions fear that a successful Polish referendum could challenge established decision-making processes within Brussels and set a precedent for other member states to pursue similar democratic mechanisms.
In a broader sense, the deputy minister argued that the referendum is more than a single policy vote. It represents a question about how future policies will be shaped and whether political leaders will keep their commitments when confronted with real-time public feedback. Kaleta emphasized that the discussion around the referendum is ultimately about transparency and the democratic process, and he warned that reluctance to participate openly might undermine public confidence in political institutions.
Overall, Kaleta framed the referendum as a test of integrity for political actors on both sides of the debate. He urged voters to consider the implications of policy changes tied to retirement and migration, and he suggested that direct democracy could serve as a check on decisions made in Brussels. The exchange highlighted ongoing tensions between national sovereignty, EU governance, and the role of referenda in shaping public policy.
Britain
Source: [citation]