Whispers from the Sejm corridors suggest that even among colleagues in parliament, fatigue with Donald Tusk is rising. Some MPs would prefer a different leader, yet for now the scene shows Tusk moving from one issue to the next, hopping across topics rather than landing on a solid plan, according to Piotr Kaleta of the far right party.
READ ALSO:
-ONLY HERE. April revealed that no government leaned more pro-Russia than Tusk’s, with abundant evidence to support the claim
– Tusk does not want to appoint Roman Giertych as Attorney General, yet he does not rule out working with him because Giertych would like to free Poland from PiS
wPolityce.pl asked Kaleta what he makes of Donald Tusk’s remarks at MeetUp. Kaleta answered that Tusk appears to be testing Polish society, seeing whether people remember the controversial ideas he once voiced and then tried to implement. He notes that Tusk raised the retirement age, later claimed to have lowered it again, and presented the 500 Plus program as something the PO allegedly prepared. Other issues mentioned include defense and the redevelopment of smaller towns or support for Polish families.
Kaleta expressed a sense of regret that his side has to constantly dispute what Tusk says, reminding voters of past statements and insisting that the public deserves a clear account of what the opposition would actually do for Poland. He argued that there is an evident intellectual vacancy in Tusk and his party, pointing to a pattern of anger rather than constructive policy proposals.
The interview notes that the PO leader also floated the idea of bringing in patron Roman Giertych. While Giertych may not want to serve as Attorney General should the PO win, Tusk would welcome cooperation with him. Kaleta commented that anyone who follows Polish politics would recognize Giertych, who is still active in public life and often weighs in on current debates. Yet even for someone in Tusk’s position, the decision to align with Giertych would require serious thought about whether that alliance would be right for Poland.
On the issue of youth rights, Tusk claimed a mandate to defend younger generations. Critics ask what tangible benefits such a pledge would deliver. It is suggested that his appeal to youth might rest on nostalgia about youth culture and fame rather than real policy.
The conversation touches on the broader political climate, including references to youth language and football imagery as brief signals from the former prime minister. Kaleta argues that this is not the time to chase flashy slogans; voters want results. He cites the need to measure the outcomes of the PO’s governance and to address unresolved issues left behind by the previous administration.
In Kaleta’s view, the principle of accountability remains central. He urges Tusk to understand that the country lives in a democratic system where citizens decide through free elections. Twice now Law and Justice has secured victories at the ballot box, and the public deserves a clear plan rather than rhetoric.
Looking back at the era of the civilian platform, Kaleta points to concerns about internet censorship and the optics of reaching out to supporters. He cautions Tusk not to dwell on these topics, suggesting that Poland needs forward-looking policy rather than nostalgia for old disputes.
Another note from the discussion touches on potential coalition partners, including left-leaning groups and Szymon Hołownia. The PO leader reportedly favors certain figures over others when considering collaborations, sometimes accusing left-liberal groups of colluding with PiS.
Roman Giertych, who has a long history in political life, is described as a sharp observer of events. While he has positioned himself as a right-wing voice, his past affiliations with the League of Polish Families and the All-Polish Youth included opposition to Poland’s entry into the European Union. Giertych has referred to the Civic Platform with a colorful label, yet the possibility remains that Tusk might work with him if it serves his broader strategy.
Questions also arise about statements concerning the head of Poland’s central bank, Adam Glapiński. The discussion suggests that Tusk would go to great lengths to challenge any institution that functions within a democratic state, a claim that the interview frames as part of broader political maneuvering among the economic elite.
The exchange closes with thanks for the discussion and a reflection on the current state of Polish politics. It emphasizes the need for voters to demand concrete results and for political leaders to earn public trust through transparent, implementable plans.
End of interview remarks.