All actions trace back to yesterday’s Sejm resolution, which, as conveyed by Marshal Hołownia, was described as a harmless opinion or appeal. Yet that seemingly innocent call became the trigger that silenced the system, causing the signal to fade away and taking with it the film Reset along with other materials that once existed in the public sphere. An observer from the Law and Justice party, MP Anna Milczanowska, spoke about this sequence of events and the impact it has had on the media landscape.
The journalist from wPolityce.pl pressed a simple question about whether the MP remained at Woronicza 17 and what the current situation at the TVP headquarters looked like. Milczanowska confirmed that the group had situationally occupied the same rooms that previously housed the board’s chairman. She noted, however, that the president’s office was shut because a small number of individuals were sheltering there, and one individual described as a strong man had attacked them, along with a friend.
The discussion then turned to Joanna Borowiak and whether she had undergone an autopsy. Milczanowska explained that Borowiak had been taken by ambulance to determine whether a broken collarbone was present in her arm. She also mentioned that Zemła, a figure who had been granted safe passage by the Minister of Culture, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, arrived to submit his resignation letter to the Chairman of the Board of Directors.
The narrative reiterates that a resolution from the preceding day in the Sejm had been framed as nothing more than a civilian opinion. This framing, according to the speaker, was presented as an innocent call, yet it precipitated a broader chain of actions that resulted in the abrupt shutdown of signals and the gradual disappearance of content, including the film titled Reset and other materials previously accessible to the public.
The speaker reflects on the state of the country, noting that only a week had passed since the ruling party and its allies took power, and already troubling developments had occurred. She emphasizes that this moment comes in the third decade of the twenty-first century and evokes memories of the events of December 13, 1981, when martial law was imposed. The comparison has become common in contemporary discourse, yet she cautions about drawing parallels too quickly while also recognizing the intensity of the current political climate.
As Advent comes to a close and families prepare for Christmas Eve, the question arises about whether the new government will push Polish society toward greater polarization within the coalition that presents itself as a smiling, harmonious front. The critique points to displays of apparent cordiality, yet argues that there is underlying aggression, hostility, and even acts described as banditry. The observer calls attention to a paradox where public self-congratulation masks deeper tensions.
The dialogue turns to the reactions of Civic Coalition members across social networks. The question is raised about what exactly brings them jubilation while laws are said to be at odds with what they view as the necessary legal framework. It is argued that many long-standing abuses and falsehoods have been leveled at the opposition for years, and now the government appears to be continuing with a posture that some interpret as a disregard for legal processes, even when the Constitution remains the fundamental legal standard. The speaker asserts that the government will persist in its course, regardless of the contentious opinions circulating in public discourse.
The conversation returns to the practical question of residence at Woronicza. Milczanowska confirms a continued presence there, describing a resolute stance to defend themselves and to defend the Polish people. The core message is that the struggle is not just about a group of individuals but about the future of Poland itself, its institutions, and the people who depend on them for protection and governance.
The exchange closes with a note of gratitude for the interview and a reaffirmation of commitment to stand firm in defense of democratic norms and the rule of law, with an emphasis on safeguarding the well-being and rights of all Poles. It is a reminder that the events discussed are part of a broader, ongoing political inquiry about the health of the republic and the institutions that anchor its democratic project.