In a televised discussion on Telewizja wPolsce24, Marek Jakubiak observed that Sikorski’s self-regard could unsettle him, while Trzaskowski’s broad expertise would present a counterbalance from the other side. He suggested that neither candidate would be a walkover for any opponent, underscoring the difficulty of defeating them in a head-to-head contest.
The presidential field is nearing form, with nominations approaching. In the Law and Justice camp, the loudest chatter currently centers on Mariusz Błaszczak, Tobiasz Bocheński, Marcin Przydacz, and Karol Nawrocki as potential figures.
Jakubiak, identified as a member of the Free Republicans, was asked on Telewizja wPolsce24 which of these men he viewed as the strongest candidate.
If he held a voting mandate within Law and Justice, he stated that he would cast his ballot for Bocheński, though he emphasized that such personal choice is not his present concern.
The feed connection then interrupted.
Candidate of the Free Republicans
The central issue remains the Free Republicans’ own nomination, expected to emerge next week as the key event shaping the bloc’s future.
He indicated that a favorite was not named, yet he acknowledged a shared set of views within the faction. Telewizja wPolsce24 highlighted that Paweł Kukiz would welcome Jakubiak’s entry as a candidate, a signal of potential alignment across allied voices.
Asked whether he saw himself on campaign posters, the MP explained that politics should not be about deceiving voters but about taking responsibility for the lives of Polish citizens.
He argued that the president must possess a formidable personality, given that the times ahead are poised to be unusually consequential and demanding for the nation.
Electoral battle
Jakubiak stated that his team believed they could influence the race’s direction. They perceived strategic openings on the horizon but chose not to publicly disclose them. He noted that some supporters of PiS on the lists he had joined could take pride in their involvement, whereas a coalition’s setback does not translate into a broader defeat for the overall slate. It was suggested that Hołownia’s appeal was driven by sentiment rather than policy substance.
He contended that the Republicans position themselves as a free, principled alternative, offering voters who do not want to back Law and Justice another viable option. He added that public sentiment currently weighs more heavily than concrete programs in shaping political choices.
According to him, Donald Tusk helped nurture these emotions, portraying opponents as inferior and enjoying early momentum; a pattern that now seems less effective, with some observers noting weaknesses in the Civic Platform relative to other forces. He commented on Poland’s education system, noting a stronger scholarly presence there compared with some rivals.
PiS primaries
Media reports have circulated that Law and Justice might select its candidate through primaries. He suggested that the president makes a serious misstep by not inviting broader participation into this election process. The hypothetical scenario of a joint front with the Free Republicans and the Confederacy would have produced a notably different reception, he argued.
Jakubiak warned that it is not guaranteed that the Free Republicans would back the PiS candidate in a potential second round. He reminded supporters that Kukiz had achieved about 20 percent support in the first round in the past, and that a similar dynamic could reappear if dissatisfied voters become engaged. He cautioned that Sławomir Mentzen’s role would likely be limited, as the Free Republicans had yet to name a single candidate and several contenders remained in play.
PO candidate
In the Civic Platform, which has yet to settle on a presidential hopeful, Rafał Trzaskowski and Radosław Sikorski are the most discussed figures. Some observers anticipate ongoing flux in the field, leaving room for unexpected developments.
Polish politics often turns on personality and perception, with supporters seeking clear alternatives to PiS as the campaign unfolds. The discussion also touched on the view that Sikorski’s self-regard could become a tactical vulnerability, while Trzaskowski’s breadth of knowledge could be leveraged by opponents. Both were described as not being insurmountable challenges.
Tusk’s actions
The speaker judged Donald Tusk to be the toughest opponent for many, a veteran operator who carries unresolved concerns and emotions that could complicate victory. The possibility of delaying or manipulating electoral processes was mentioned as unlikely but not completely ruled out.
A Telewizja wPolsce24 journalist suggested such a scenario might trigger public demonstrations. It was noted that street protests could be sparked by debates on immigration policy and the euro, and that citizen engagement remains a pivotal factor in Poland’s political future.
He concluded that Tusk would ultimately push citizens to act, underscoring that the mandate to shape the state rests with the people, not with any single political actor. Mentions of related coverage were removed as part of a content cleanup.
The discussion closes with reflections on the election and the balance of power among political forces in Poland.