A prominent Law and Justice member, Professor Piotr Gliński, recently voiced grave concerns about what he described as an assault on Polish democracy driven by deliberate misinformation. Speaking on television, he highlighted the perceived threats emanating from the actions of the current governmental leadership and warned that the integrity of democratic institutions could be compromised if such pressures persist.
Gliński argued that democracy in Poland stands at a critical juncture. He noted that when a nation relies largely on a single, dominant narrative across most media outlets, the vitality of democracy itself is endangered. While acknowledging the important role of independent private media, he stressed that an imbalance of power exists and that forceful, legally questionable methods have been used to influence or seize control of key institutions. He described what he viewed as a coup against the courts and the prosecution as an unprecedented development in a democratic system. Source: wPolityce
In a related critique, the former Deputy Prime Minister spoke about what he sees as ongoing political manipulation. He claimed that opponents have exploited lies to destabilize the government’s ministries and insisted that the situation represents an assault on Polish democracy requiring careful and persistent scrutiny. The commentary suggested that the spread of misinformation and media censorship were connected components of a broader strategy to reshape public discourse. Source: wPolityce
The discussion also turned to the creation of a Working Team for Poland. Gliński described this initiative as a pragmatic step aimed at sustaining a serious, policy-focused approach to governance. He contrasted this with rivals who, in his view, prioritized emotional triggers and institutional takeovers over substantive policy work. He referred to foreign influence in recent elections as a factor that amplified emotional messaging, arguing that the opponents leaned on symbolic, attention-grabbing appeals rather than substantive policy proposals. Source: wPolityce
Additionally, the piece referenced a broader exchange about the Labor Team for Poland, framed as a cross-party forum for idea exchange. The discussion stressed that such a platform should be inclusive and constructive, encouraging dialogue across political lines to strengthen the nation’s governance. The emphasis remained on policy clarity, accountability, and the preservation of democratic norms. Source: wPolityce
Overall, the coverage presented views from political leadership about safeguarding Poland’s democratic framework. It underscored concerns about media plurality, judicial independence, and the risk of external interference in domestic affairs. The remarks were circulated through television coverage and echoed by commentators aware of the delicate balance between political strategy and constitutional guarantees. Source: wPolityce
Note: The material reflects statements from Polish political figures and is presented as part of ongoing public discourse on the state of democracy in Poland. It is intended to summarize viewpoints and context rather than to advocate a specific policy position. Source: wPolityce