Professor Piotr Gliński appeared on the program “Guest News” where the head of the Ministry of Culture discussed a range of topics, including Poland’s defense plans from an earlier era under the Civic Platform government. He stressed that it is difficult to accept the notion that defense considerations were being handled with such a mindset.
According to Gliński, the idea that the state’s security strategy could be viewed through that lens is hard to swallow. He described the proposed measures as not truly defensible plans but rather occupation-style scenarios, calling the approach completely irresponsible. The phrase that has circulated in political discourse is the so-called “Tusk’s Line of Betrayal,” which critics say would distribute defense burdens in a way that halves the country and leaves the remainder exposed to aggression. He characterized such proposals as a form of madness, highlighting the gravity of the choices being debated.
– Gliński noted.
He added that it was unclear who stood to gain from these ideas. He pointed out that the option appears to be closely tied to Berlin, while the broader context of the so‑called “Reset” strategy seems to advance Russian-German interests at Poland’s expense.
– Gliński commented.
German interests with Russia
Gliński also drew attention to the ongoing cooperation between Germany and Russia. He recalled that Germany had engaged in substantial collaboration with the Russian Federation, and he referenced the role of the former German Chancellor in Russia. The discussions around Nord Stream projects, which some argue surrounded Poland, were mentioned, along with the related Opal corridor that, in the view of critics, effectively reduced Western connectivity. He expressed hope that such arrangements would not be allowed to return or gain traction.
– Gliński stated.
He further commented on Donald Tusk’s remarks about the influence of Western culture on segments of contemporary Poland. Any reasonable observer would see that the narrative around this topic is unraveling. Tusk is perceived as reacting emotionally, and his statements about the supposed predominance of Western or German cultural norms and the associated order were criticized. The argument was made that Polish character is defined by a strong work ethic, orderly pragmatism, and a deep commitment to the homeland, values that Gliński argued are present across the country.
– Gliński asserted.
The discussion also touched on the broader political climate, including critiques of public communication surrounding historical and cultural references in Polish governance. The dialogue underscored the tension between different political visions for Poland’s future and the perceived influence of external partners on national decision-making. The emphasis remained on clarifying Poland’s strategic priorities and ensuring that national defense and sovereignty are safeguarded against external pressures.
In closing remarks, Gliński reiterated his view that public discourse should remain focused on concrete national interests and the protection of Polish territorial integrity. He cautioned against narrative shortcuts that could undermine the country’s security framework and called for responses grounded in responsibility and a clear understanding of Poland’s strategic needs. (Source: wPolityce)