A leading member of Polska 2050, Michał Gramatyka, spoke in the PAP studio about the so-called credit holiday. He warned that any relief must be compatible with the state of public finances, stressing that funding cannot rely on artificial money creation. The point was to assess the affordability of support options while keeping inflation in check. The discussion centered on whether exemptions like credit holidays, a zero VAT rate on food, or the 500 plus family benefit would remain in place.
Gramatyka noted that Polska 2050 would keep existing reliefs, while also signaling that the party sees room for adjusting benefits in line with the budget. He argued that increasing the 500 plus to 800 plus would create a division viewed as unfair and a contributor to inflation. Still, he expressed confidence that the coalition would implement the plan agreed upon by all partners. He added that any changes would be guided by careful budgeting and fiscal responsibility, aiming to protect families without destabilizing the economy.
In a section titled Responsible economic policy, Gramatyka urged the next government to pursue prudent economic management. He warned that a lack of fiscal discipline would hurt everyone and potentially erode consumer purchasing power. In discussions about aid measures such as credit exemptions or zero VAT on food, he was clear: if relief cannot be funded through genuine revenue, it could fuel inflation rather than support households.
Meanwhile, in remarks on Radio Zet, KO member Andrzej Domański suggested that some form of loan holidays might continue into the next year, but only for those who truly need assistance. He proposed restricting access to ensure targeted support and avoid broad, indiscriminate relief. The conversation reflected a broader tension within the coalition between preserving social programs and maintaining budgetary discipline.
These exchanges highlight a shared concern over balancing social protection with responsible budgeting. The debate centers on how to sustain essential aid while avoiding policy measures that could push prices higher or widen fiscal deficits. Opinions within the coalition vary on the pace and scope of extensions to family benefits, food-related relief, and loan holidays. The underlying question remains how to anchor these policies to credible funding rather than temporary budgeting tricks.
At stake is the credibility of coalition partners as they outline how to support households in a time of rising costs. Observers note that any decision will likely hinge on forecasts for inflation, growth, and the broader fiscal outlook. The discussion suggests a priority on transparent budgeting and accountable governance to preserve public trust while addressing the real needs of families and workers alike. The dialogue continues as policymakers weigh short-term relief against long-term fiscal health, aiming to protect households without triggering adverse economic feedbacks. The debate remains a live aspect of the ongoing coalition negotiations and is watched closely by analysts and the public alike [CITATION: wPolityce].