The constitution, in its interpretation, refrains from naming a PiS Poland or a PiS government; it speaks of a Polish government and a nation that must always refer to Poland itself. It binds Poland to loyalty to the Republic. If one asks Prime Minister Tusk whom he serves, there is cause for doubt, remarks Stanisław Janecki, a columnist for the weekly magazine Sieci, during Salon Dziennikarski on Telewizja wPoland. Michał Karnowski’s guests discussed the Cabinet Council held at the Presidential Palace on February 13 as part of their commentary.
Cabinet council
It is worth recalling that Donald Tusk, in the public portion of the Cabinet Council, pointed to a document alleging the illegal use of the Pegasus system. He suggested that the president may not have full knowledge or awareness of events surrounding a major nuclear energy project, the so-called small reactors. Regarding CPK, he stated that every detail of the investment appeared disturbing or scandalous. President Andrzej Duda underscored that Poland is waiting for investments and that such investments are needed. He noted that for large undertakings like CPK or nuclear power plants, the preparation process itself entails substantial costs — including the drafting of concepts, expert opinions, and preliminary design documentation — costs that are, unfortunately, high. He stressed the necessity of proper designs and permits before construction begins.
Nevertheless, vigilance is required to avoid populism by claiming that money has already been spent. The expenditures were published because they had to be made public, and there was no other option. From the Prime Minister’s remarks, it seems these investments will be carried out, which is precisely the essence of the matter for the speaker: their implementation is what matters most.
— the president asserted.
In relation to small nuclear reactors and Tusk’s statements on the topic, the president indicated awareness of certain activities within the Internal Security Agency and its management. This is one of the reasons these matters continue to be examined, and it was during today’s session that the Prime Minister had the opportunity to review these ABW assessments as well.
— said President Duda.
READ ALSO:
— Cabinet Council Meeting. President Duda on CPK, Nuclear Power, and Military Modernization: People await progress regardless of opinion
— Tusk’s remark during the Cabinet Council: confirmation of Pegasus purchase and its use, legally and illegally
— Online uproar after the cabinet council. “President Duda brought down Prime Minister Tusk”; “Tusk’s speech shows weakness”
“Classical Tusk infantilism”
Stanisław Janecki highlighted that the President’s authority to convene the Cabinet Council stems from Article 141 of the Polish Constitution. What once looked impressive in Pro-Tusk propaganda was, in his view, classic Tusk infantilism. Tusk, who performed to the tune of “Hey Jude,” spent seven million PLN to celebrate Poland’s tenth anniversary of EU membership in a place that many saw as misguided. He also accused them of paying experts who work on the CPK project. The speaker argues that such costs are the result of a world where experts who are scarce command attention and money. He also noted that the costs included money for land acquisitions, detailing approximately a thousand hectares bought at prices above market value.
— emphasized Stanisław Janecki.
Małgorzata Żaryn reminded listeners of a complaint about an airport in Berlin, suggesting that CPK might be unnecessary. Yet, despite political affiliations, many Poles are thinking rationally. After extensive debate, it emerges that CPK is not only about an airport but also about rail infrastructure, acting as a transport hub that could bring economic benefits to Poland. More importantly, it is a strategic issue: in times of potential conflict in the East, having a robust airfield beyond the front line is seen by some as essential.
— said Małgorzata Żaryn.
The historian, addressing the accusation that CPK may be hard to defend against a potential strike, pointed out that in that logic one might abstain from building anything beyond so-called 15-minute cities with medieval-style defensive walls. Nevertheless, from the standpoint of Polish sovereignty, economic independence, and the public’s sense of security, CPK is viewed as a necessary project. The hope is that voters from various parties recognize that some issues transcend party lines, and that the spectrum of debate about this investment can be put behind them.
— said Żaryn.
CKP the common denominator?
When asked whether the CPK could become a unifying theme for Poland’s divided political landscape, Krzysztof Skowroński drew attention to a parliamentary team that includes representatives from diverse political backgrounds. Tusk has shifted the tone from talking about a taxi and different airport projects to a focus on accountability, audits, and financial transparency. While figures and sums are highlighted, specifics on timelines and operational details are often missing. The broader controversy includes a high-profile severance payment reported for a one-day engagement, which has drawn scrutiny and sparked debate about how public money is valued and spent. The discussion also touched on a broader shift within public policy and the government’s approach to paying market-rate salaries for skilled professionals. In Skowroński’s view, to build a modern country, it is essential to compensate specialists appropriately in line with market rates.
— said Skowronski.
To this, Żaryn added that Tusk’s focus on income and expenditure reveals an accusatory tone. The Cabinet Council meetings, she suggested, have been used as stages for political exposition whose roots lie in suspicions of alleged wrongdoing by PiS. The discussion proceeds from the assumption that there are PiS institutions and PiS investments, and not just Poland. The constitution, regardless of interpretation, states that there is no PiS Poland, only Poland, and that loyalty is owed to the Republic. If the question is who remains loyal to that Republic, the answer remains subject to doubt.
— emphasized Stanisław Janecki.
wkt
Source: wPolityce