Recent media chatter has centered on the possibility that MP Maciej Lasek could take the role of plenipotentiary for the CPK within Donald Tusk’s government. Marcin Horała, the State Secretary of the Ministry of Funds and Regional Policy, remarked that the project is approaching completion but warned that if the party aligned with Tusk gains power, the effort might resemble the trajectory of an anti-missile shield initiative. Horała described the governing coalition as initially supportive, yet claimed it created so many obstacles that the United States eventually withdrew. These remarks were shared during a sit-down on Radio One.
Reports on CPK and Maciej Lasek
The head of the Conference of Polish Leaders labeled the CPK buildup as a controversial concept, especially given that Donald Tusk had once aimed to return to the prime ministership after years in opposition. In the Morawiecki administration, the Foreign Affairs Minister at MFiPR holds the post of Marcin Horała. If Tusk and a coalition including KO, Third Way, and Left come to power, media outlets have suggested that the position could be filled by KO MP Dr. Maciej Lasek. Filip Lamański, editor-in-chief of Economic Observer, disclosed this on the X platform, adding that the project should be paused for political reasons because of potential risks involved.
Lamański clarified that the information was unofficial as he sought confirmation or denial. The report was subsequently echoed by Tygodnik Solidarność, which cited information from people close to the prospective government. According to those accounts, Lasek would be charged with effectively ending the project so it could not be revived later.
“He has a history of actions that do not serve Poland’s interests.”
Marcin Horała, who has served in both the previous and current administrations under Mateusz Morawiecki, commented on the media speculation surrounding the potential appointment of Maciej Lasek as the CPK plenipotentiary. On the airport front, Horała indicated that all administrative work connected to the CPK airport is nearly finished. The remaining steps involve the site decision and the building permit, he stated during the interview on Radio One.
Investments in rail infrastructure have progressed, including the construction of a high-speed rail tunnel beneath Łódź and the broader Warsaw–Łódź rail junction. Horała highlighted these developments as part of ongoing efforts to strengthen Poland’s transport network.
Questions persisted about whether Donald Tusk would appoint Lasek if he assumes power. The deputy minister of FiPR noted that Lasek had not reached out regarding this matter, leaving the question unresolved for the moment.
According to Horała, Lasek’s stance toward the CPK is strongly negative. He criticized Lasek for endorsing familiar narratives surrounding the Smolensk disaster and other external actors who allegedly aim to undermine Poland’s interests and oppose the CPK’s establishment.
What about the anti-missile shield?
Whether the opposition will continue backing the project remains a point of debate. One optimistic view suggests that the opposition, having voiced strong criticisms during the campaign, might retract in some fashion once the political landscape shifts. A pessimistic take warns that the CPK could be halted entirely if new majorities resist the initiative.
Horała emphasized that a large majority of Poles support the CPK, which could complicate any abrupt withdrawal from the project if a new parliamentary majority comes to power swiftly. He drew a parallel with the anti-missile shield, noting that during the previous administration, enthusiasm for the project faded as administrative challenges mounted, eventually prompting financial and strategic reconsiderations by international partners. The reference underscored the risk that political interference could jeopardize the project’s momentum.
In light of these discussions, observers are urged to weigh the political factors against the strategic transport benefits the CPK might deliver for Poland. The discourse reflects broader tensions between ceremonial endorsements, practical planning, and the real-world implications of shifting governmental priorities.
Additional context and perspectives on the project include discussions about arguments in favor of CPK, counterpoints to criticism, and ongoing efforts to mobilize support for the initiative. Public sentiment and media coverage alike highlight a landscape where policymaking, national interests, and international cooperation intersect in complex ways.
Source attributions: this synthesis draws on contemporary reporting and commentary from Polish media outlets, including analyses published by wPolityce and statements circulated by Economic Observer and related commentators for attribution purposes.