Polish Sejm to Consider Resolution on External Interference in Elections
Echoes of a provocative statement by Manfred Weber have intensified debate in Poland about foreign meddling in national elections. In response, the PiS Club announced it would table a Sejm resolution condemning external attempts to influence the democratic electoral process, stated PiS MP Radosław Fogiel during a Sejm briefing.
At a press conference, Fogiel, who leads the parliamentary foreign affairs committee, outlined the draft resolution titled “on external attempts to interfere in the democratic electoral process.” He indicated the Sejm could begin consideration at the next session, underscoring the seriousness with which the party views outside influences on Poland’s vote.
Text of the Proposed Resolution
The persistent comment by Manfred Weber, the head of the European People’s Party and a German politician, claiming interference in Polish elections has kept the issue in the public sphere. In light of these remarks, the Law and Justice club announced its plan to submit a Sejm draft resolution condemning external efforts to disrupt Poland’s electoral integrity. The aim is clear: the Polish parliament should take a firm stand and publicly denounce such interference, a move described as essential by the authors of the measure.
Fogel elaborated that the resolution emphasizes the gravity of interference attempts and calls for unwavering vigilance to safeguard Poland’s democratic processes.
In an interview with German broadcaster ZDF, Weber characterized PiS as opponents of the rule of law and asserted that all parties must respect legal norms. He further linked the German AfD, Le Pen’s party in France, and PiS in Poland as adversaries, a stance that has reverberated across political circles in Poland and beyond. Weber’s comments, already voiced before, have framed a broader debate on EU political cohesion and national sovereignty.
Weber’s broader stance on Poland’s place in Europe has drawn particular attention. In remarks captured by the press, he claimed that the forces opposing PiS would be instrumental in steering Poland toward a European framework that he perceives as favorable to democratic norms.
As one commentator noted, the debate centers on whether Poland’s political leadership should reassert its autonomy in the face of external pressures while continuing a path toward closer European integration. The exchange has raised questions about how Poland views its electoral sovereignty and the conditions under which other European actors speak about internal Polish matters.
German Perspectives on the Rule of Law
Parliamentary member Joanna Borowiak weighed in, expressing strong concern about Weber’s remarks about her party and drawing on historical memory to argue that past German actions against Poland cast a long shadow over contemporary discourse. She suggested that when discussing rule of law, Germany should convey a message that acknowledges historical responsibility while promoting lawful conduct today.
Borowiak stressed that the current Polish context requires careful language that respects both nations’ histories and legal frameworks. Her remarks reflect a broader call for clarity and restraint in discussions about bilateral relations and legal standards in Europe.
Another member, Terasa Wargocka, pointed to a climate of verbal attacks that has intensified during political contests, arguing that such rhetoric harms Poland’s standing abroad. She noted the need to restore unity within Poland’s political class and to allowPoles to decide their government without undue pressure or sensationalized narratives from external actors.
Wargocka argued that as Poland approaches elections, the country’s voters deserve a calm and respectful political environment that focuses on policy and national interests rather than external sensationalism. The aim, she said, is to end the current pattern of public disputes that spill across borders.
Robert Gontarz, another member of parliament, underscored that Poles, not foreign commentators, should determine the country’s course. He argued that the electorate owns the process and will exercise its judgment in line with Poland’s own political priorities.
In closing, the discussion highlighted the ongoing tension between national sovereignty and European discourse on governance. While the draft resolution is framed as a defense of electoral integrity, it also reflects broader concerns about how external voices shape national political landscapes in contemporary Europe.
Source materials and contemporary coverage indicate that the topic remains charged across Polish media and political communities, signaling a continuing conversation about interference, sovereignty, and the mechanics of governance in a united Europe.