This statement reflects concerns about European political structures and legitimacy. A Polish PiS MEP, Prof. Ryszard Legutko, called out Manfred Weber’s remarks, asserting that Weber holds no rightful sway over Poland’s election outcomes and that the EPP is positioned as the only force capable of replacing PiS in the country. The critique stresses that Weber is not a voter and does not represent Polish voters, yet he acts as if he wields influence over Poland’s political process. Such interference is described as a dangerous degeneration of the political system.
“Why should he limit himself to choosing a party he does not favor?”
The argument suggests that Weber could lead politics in Poland even if he does not align with the party currently supported by many voters. The claim posits that Weber would continue shaping Polish politics regardless of his official role, and that he would not have spoken so forcefully had the Polish opposition not given him space to act.
The PiS MEP also questioned the involvement of Donald Tusk and whether German influence is behind aggressive rhetoric in disputes over sovereignty and national direction. There is concern that some Polish circles appreciate language that challenges Poland’s independence and sovereignty, and that outside actors might impose policies or influences on Poland’s government. The speaker characterized these actors as actively seeking to diminish Poland’s sovereignty and to permit external powers to issue directives to Polish leaders.
Additional commentary noted the broader media conversation surrounding Weber’s statements and their reception in Poland and beyond. The discussion highlights ongoing tensions about national autonomy, European political alignments, and the degree of influence wielded by non-Polish actors in Poland’s political scene. The rhetoric reflects fears that external interests could shape the country’s political landscape rather than Poles themselves determining their governance.
Source attributions and coverage are noted in regional media discussions and commentaries, illustrating how different outlets frame Weber’s remarks and their implications for Poland’s political sovereignty. The debate remains part of a wider conversation about democratic accountability, party leadership, and the role of international actors in domestic politics.
[citation: wPolityce]