In remarks from Cezary Kaźmierczak, who leads the Association of Entrepreneurs and Employers and serves as Vice-President of the Council for Social Dialogue, the economic picture is clear. He suggested that a federally structured European Union, with harmonized taxes, labor laws, and service regulations, would not lift Poland toward its richer neighbors. Instead, it would widen the gap, making it harder for Poland to catch up with Germany or anyone else within the bloc.
Kaźmierczak stressed a simple point: if the entire union moves toward uniform rules across member states, the path to growth can stall for countries that still need to adapt or compete on price, efficiency, and innovation. The message was delivered with emphasis on the potential consequences of over-standardization, particularly in a region with diverse economic strengths and institutional maturity. The idea is not to block integration but to challenge policymakers to consider a balance between shared rules and national flexibility that allows Poland to pursue its own development strategy.
As a visual metaphor, he described a scene in which the coxswain of a pursuing boat would have little chance to close the distance if he mirrored every move of the leader. The image conveys a concern that identical tactics across different economies may erode the very advantages that come from tailored approaches to growth and reform. The argument, presented by the association’s chair, centers on the risk that sameness in policy could suppress the distinctive structural reforms Poland would need to accelerate its progress.
The statistic cited was stark: GDP per capita rose from about 30 percent of a benchmark in 1990 to nearly 70 percent in more recent years. The crux of the point is that continued harmonization of laws could slow the gains achieved through Poland’s targeted reforms, unless there is room for a country-specific blueprint that matches its stage of development. The discussion was framed as a warning that one-size-fits-all regulation might not deliver what it promises, particularly for nations that are still catching up in productivity and investment.
Within this context, the emphasis remained on practical steps and policy choices that preserve national sovereignty in economic strategy while supporting broader European integration. It is a call to weigh the benefits of deeper integration against the need for flexible implementation that respects different national trajectories. The overall message highlights that progress does not necessarily require uniformity in every area; rather, it demands thoughtful sequencing and differentiation to sustain growth.
tkwl/X
Note: analysis and commentary reflect the stance of the association and have been discussed in relation to ongoing debates about EU treaties and economic policy alignment. The ideas here are presented to inform readers about policy considerations and do not constitute official positions from all involved parties. Attribution for the discussion is provided to WPolityce.