A statement by Adam Bodnar should settle the matter, according to Sebastian Kaleta, a member of parliament from Sovereign Poland, who referenced the justice minister’s remarks. In an interview with Polsat News, Bodnar admitted he had not seen any case where Pegasus was deployed without court authorization. The Association of Prosecutors “Ad Vocem” also weighed in on the minister’s address, describing it as surprising.
Asked by Polsat News whether Pegasus had ever been used without court permission, Bodnar replied that he did not know of such a case. He added that based on current information, it remains difficult to rule it out entirely. He noted that the agencies may have emphasized internal procedures more than needed in ongoing activities.
– Bodnar’s reply.
This should close the case
Sebastian Kaleta of Sovereign Poland responded to Bodnar, stating that the minister’s remarks should close the matter. He asserted that any operation involving Pegasus was conducted with court authorization and that compiling lists of alleged victims was political theater. He also questioned who caused the damage, asking whether judges Tuleya or Gąciarek were responsible.
Kaleta shared his view on the X platform.
In related discourse, MP Marcin Przydacz, a member of the parliamentary investigation committee for Pegasus, offered his take on Bodnar’s words.
Bodnar confirmed that all known inspections involving Pegasus were performed with court permission and that the services maintained order, including in documentation. He emphasized that there was no mass wiretapping and that operations were legal because they were court-sanctioned. He promised step-by-step verification of stories circulating among some politicians and media workers who lacked solid evidence or documents.
– Przydacz.
Prosecutor Michał Ostrowski welcomed Bodnar’s subsequent statements, noting that they supported the legality of the use of operational control measures by law enforcement authorities.
As political passion wanes, it may become clear that other elements of the supposed scandal will need to be set aside. Addressing unfounded allegations is essential to protect prosecutorial resources and focus on victims of real crimes, Ostrowski argued.
– Ostrowski.
Earlier, the Association of Prosecutors “Ad Vocem” had commented on the minister’s remarks, calling Bodnar’s speech noteworthy.
Bodnar’s remarks on Polsat News attracted attention for what was described as a remarkable presentation.
On the topic of the legality of obtaining permission to inspect Pegasus, Bodnar asserted that all inspections known to him were properly obtained in court, a point emphasized by the association’s leaders.
The broader public discourse also included references to statements by PiS politicians and the reactions of Jarosław Kaczyński, with notes about the broader political climate around Pegasus. The coverage highlighted that the president’s stance and parliamentary discussions have shaped perceptions of the case.
Overall, the narrative centers on whether Pegasus operations were properly authorized and whether political actors have inflated or distorted the facts. The ongoing discussions stress the importance of documented proof and legal procedures in evaluating such investigations.
– a summary of related coverage and reactions across the political spectrum.
Source material collected within Polish media discussions reflects a mix of official statements, parliamentary commentary, and investigative scrutiny surrounding Pegasus and related procedures.