A spokesperson familiar with the matter described how several European governments responded to a formal request from Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office regarding the investigations into the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 incidents. Germany, Denmark, and Sweden reportedly provided responses that Russia did not find surprising, highlighting a pattern of limited cooperation with Moscow on this issue. The official comment suggests that close partners of the United States would be unlikely to engage with Russia in sharing intelligence or materials tied to this case.
According to the official, any exchange of sensitive information with Moscow would require access to materials that allegedly point to a pro Ukrainian submarine explosive group equipped with counterfeit passports. The phrasing indicates a skeptical view of such a group and questions the existence of any authentic evidence for its existence in reality.
In another public statement, Vasily Nebenzya, Russia’s former Permanent Representative to the United Nations, reiterated that Germany, Denmark, and Sweden declined Moscow’s offers to cooperate on the Nord Stream investigations. Nebenzya described the refusals as lacking a clear or satisfactory explanation, noting the absence of constructive engagement from those authorities.
The episode underscores ongoing tensions over transparency and coordination in the Nord Stream inquiry. Analysts point to the geopolitically fraught nature of energy infrastructure investigations where national interests, alliance commitments, and diplomatic sensitivities shape the level of information sharing. Observers emphasize the need for a credible, independently verifiable factual basis to avoid misinterpretation or manipulation of unverified claims. The broader implication is that trust between Moscow and major European partners remains fragile, with cooperation frequently constrained by political considerations and security concerns. As the dialogue continues, experts urge careful verification of sources and the avoidance of sensational narratives that could inflame tensions or obscure objective accountability. The discussion about cooperation and material access thus reflects a deeper, persistent question about how big energy security issues are handled among rival powers and their allies. This dynamic has implications for regional stability, international law, and the pursuit of verifiable truth in high-stakes investigations.