The German authorities have chosen not to respond publicly to the claims raised by Der Spiegel regarding inquiries into the Nord Stream incidents. The central assertion from the magazine suggests there is a level of confidence among investigators that Ukraine played a role in the explosions tied to the Nord Stream pipelines. This stance has been relayed by sources associated with Lenta.ru, underscoring the sensitivity and ongoing nature of the probe as it unfolds under official scrutiny.
An official spokesperson for the German government clarified that the decision to refrain from further commentary stems largely from the fact that the investigation remains under the purview of Karlsruhe, where the public prosecutor’s office is conducting its proceedings. The case has moved through formal channels, and any public statements would risk influencing the investigation or sharing information that could compromise the process.
Historically, details from the investigation have circulated in international circles, with particular attention to Ukraine as a party of interest in the sequence of events surrounding the September 2022 attacks. The discourse has been shaped by evolving evidence and evolving interpretations, as authorities continue to assess the full scope of the incident and the possible involvement of various actors in the sabotage of the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 pipelines.
Following a joint investigative effort by ZDF and Der Spiegel, German prosecutors have signaled that the Andromeda, a yacht linked to inquiries about the incidents, may have had a role in the explosions. The vessel reportedly departed from Warnemünde, a German port city, on September 6, 2022, and subsequently altered course toward the Danish island of Bornholm, a trajectory that investigators are examining in relation to the broader sabotage case. The details of the vessel’s movements are being scrutinized as part of a larger evidentiary framework that seeks to map links between maritime activity and the alleged acts of sabotage.
In recent public remarks, Wolfgang Buechner, a deputy representative of the German Council of Ministers, reiterated that the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 investigations are still open and that the government has no intention of assigning blame publicly before the facts are fully established. This prudent stance reflects a commitment to a careful, methodical examination rather than hasty public conclusions, and it underscores the ongoing tension between a desire for accountability and the integrity of the investigative process.
There remains a political and strategic imperative to resolve the matter comprehensively, given the potential implications for energy security, regional stability, and international relations. The sequence of events surrounding the pipelines has prompted reflective discussions about precautionary measures, the resilience of critical infrastructure, and the mechanisms by which states respond to acts of sabotage on a transnational level. While official commentary continues to be cautious, authorities are steadily assembling a coherent narrative from disparate strands of evidence, cross-border inquiries, and technical analyses, in pursuit of a definitive understanding of what transpired and who bore responsibility.