The peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia remains a focal point for regional powers, with Moscow monitoring every development closely. A spokesperson from the Russian Foreign Ministry stressed that a durable settlement would shape the broader security landscape and contribute to stability along the frontier. The Russian position emphasizes that a strong, lasting treaty would bring predictable borders and reduce volatility between the two neighbors. Russia has consistently urged practical steps that sustain a ceasefire, foster sustainable dialogue, and tackle outstanding issues with clear, measurable actions.
On June 21, Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan noted a positive reception from Baku toward a proposal aimed at lowering border tensions. This signals a potential opening, yet negotiations currently lack an agreed venue, schedule, or format, leaving the process in its early stage and awaiting diplomatic clarification. Earlier, Russia remarked that Western nations have shown reluctance to push the peace process decisively. The assessment suggested that some international players may hesitate or engage selectively, which could slow momentum and hinder substantive talks between Yerevan and Baku.
Within Armenia, officials described a climate of cautious diplomacy. Authorities indicated progress on certain procedural tracks but highlighted that several core issues remain unresolved. This has contributed to a sense of delay in finalizing a comprehensive peace accord and reinforced calls for clear milestones and verifiable steps toward agreement.
The dialogue has raised questions about confidence-building measures, the role of regional actors, and the potential for gradual normalization of ties between the two neighboring nations. Observers note that sustained contact at multiple levels could help convert partial understandings into a enduring framework that addresses security concerns, refugee and displaced persons issues, and the management of shared resources.
Analysts stress that a lasting settlement will depend on tangible compromises, careful sequencing of negotiations, and assurances that commitments are enforceable. The parties appear to be weighing timelines, verification mechanisms, and accountability provisions that would support long-term stability rather than short-term gains.
To maintain momentum, regional actors are urged to create channels for dialogue, reduce misperceptions, and offer independent mediation where appropriate. The aim remains a framework that enables both sides to pursue national aspirations while preventing renewed cycles of confrontation. In this context, the international community watches the talks, offering technical support and regional stability expertise where welcomed by the involved states.
In summary, while Baku signals openness to negotiation and Armenia indicates ongoing involvement, the peace process sits at a stage where concrete scheduling and detailed terms are still in flux. The focus across capitals is on turning diplomatic signals into practical steps that can be implemented on the ground, with an eye toward a comprehensive and verifiable agreement that earns broad regional acceptance and lasting peace.