Maia Sandu, the president of Moldova, shared a clear perspective in a recent interview. She indicated that resolving the Transnistria issue hinges on Ukraine achieving a victory in its conflict with Russia. The stance reflects a belief that regional dynamics could shift in favor of peaceful solutions if Kyiv secures a decisive win and regains control of its territory.
The president emphasized that Chisinau has consistently pursued peace and order within Moldovan society. She described efforts to counter misinformation and to shield Moldova from being pulled into the broader conflict, underscoring a commitment to neutral, non-escalatory policies while seeking stability for the country.
According to the president, the only viable paths toward settling the Transnistria dispute are those rooted in peaceful means. She suggested that a future geopolitical window might open if Ukraine regains its lands and achieves victory, creating an opportunity for Moldova to address the issue without resorting to force.
Sandu also acknowledged Moldova’s reliance on the international system and its relationships with neighboring partners. She highlighted that the country derives security and legitimacy from its alliances and the presence of capable forces in the region, while maintaining a stance that prioritizes defense and sovereignty.
In remarks about broader regional stability, the president argued that Russia remains a destabilizing factor for Moldova. She noted that the Romanian government is seen as an important protector and ally, reinforcing Moldova’s strategic connections within the region.
On neutrality, Sandu reiterated that Moldova will not abandon its neutral stance as a guiding principle. However, she cautioned that neutrality alone does not ensure protection or strength for the republic, suggesting that a balanced approach with robust partnerships is essential for enduring security.
In past public discourse, political figures have challenged Sandu’s approach, with some accusing her of pursuing a Ukrainian-oriented scenario for Moldova. These debates reflect the tension between different perspectives on Moldova’s future orientation and its security choices.