Authorities in Lubaczów are continuing their search for a Subaru driver who veered off the road into a ditch in Stare Oleszyce and fled the scene. Police preliminary indications point to possible alcohol involvement. Unofficial information circulating within the investigation suggests that the vehicle owner is a judge who has been absent from work for two days, with a resignation reportedly filed with the court on the preceding Wednesday.
Małgorzata Reizer, the spokesperson for the Przemyśl Court, provided an update to the press in the afternoon, confirming that the judge has not appeared at work since Tuesday. She noted that there was a two-day window for the judge to explain the absence to the employer.
New information indicates that the judge has filed a medical discharge. This detail was conveyed to reporters by the court spokesperson.
Reizer also addressed questions about the timing and nature of the judge’s release, stating that the medical discharge spans from May 30 to June 2.
Sergeant Elżbieta Huber of the Poviat Police Station in Lubaczów told reporters that investigators remained focused on locating the Subaru driver. When pressed about the vehicle’s owner, she described that information as a sensitive part of the case and declined to disclose further details to protect the ongoing investigation.
Questions around the case and potential conflicts
The incident occurred just before noon on Monday when police received a report about a white Subaru found in a roadside ditch in Stare Oleszyce. Upon arrival, officers could not locate the driver at the scene, prompting a broader inquiry.
Media coverage has linked the car to a judge from the Lubaczów District Court, Artur Broś, who is also associated with the Iustitia Judges Association. Reports indicated that the Przemyśl court, which oversees the Lubaczów court, was notified of the event, and documents from the incident were subsequently forwarded to the Lubaczów district prosecutor’s office for review.
Investigators have emphasized that the case involves multiple pieces of evidence, including witness accounts and physical findings at the scene. In judging the seriousness of the incident, prosecutors noted that simply leaving a damaged vehicle does not automatically preclude accountability, and they stressed that the presence of possible impairment by alcohol could influence the ongoing assessment of responsibility.
A spokesperson from the Lubaczów prosecutor’s office, Agnieszka Nieckarz-Proszek, stated that the inquiry is proceeding with police oversight and under the supervision of the prosecutor’s office. This arrangement ensures a coordinated approach to gathering further evidence and interviewing additional witnesses as needed.
The investigation remains in the data-gathering phase, with law enforcement officials collecting statements, reviewing surveillance footage if available, and examining the vehicle for any signs that could corroborate or challenge initial assumptions about the driver’s condition at the time of the accident.
Additional context from the case highlights the broader conversation about accountability and professional conduct for public officials in situations where alleged misconduct intersects with traffic incidents. Officials have underscored the importance of conducting a thorough, impartial inquiry that respects due process while addressing public interest concerns in high-profile cases.
As the investigation unfolds, authorities are careful to balance the need for transparency with the necessity of protecting investigative integrity and the privacy of individuals involved. The public can expect updates as more evidence becomes available and as prosecutors determine whether any charges should be filed or further actions pursued.
Note: This report summarizes publicly released information and reflects the evolving nature of the inquiry. All details are subject to change as more facts come to light and as the official review progresses.