Prof. Zdzisław Krasnodębski, a PiS member of the European Parliament, was asked on RMF FM about the reasons behind PiS’s defeat in the election. He highlighted a mix of factors, pointing to misguided management and inappropriate language as part of the problem. While he acknowledged that tensions with the European Union and a ruling by the Constitutional Court also played a role, his assessment emphasized how these issues were amplified by poor organizational choices and language that did not resonate with voters.
He argued that, beyond the well-known external pressures, the party’s internal handling created vulnerabilities. The election cycle had ended with only a slender parliamentary majority, necessitating compromises that allowed some personalities to gain visibility in the public arena, sometimes in ways that seemed incongruent with the party’s established image. Krasnodębski suggested that these appearances may have unsettled supporters and created openings for critics to challenge the party’s direction.
When pressed to comment on whether a particular figure should have been excluded from political discussions or from future opportunities based on past actions, the interviewer did not shy away from asking specific questions. These exchanges underscored a broader debate about accountability and the balancing act required during a crowded political slate.
The conversation touched on symbolic moments within the party’s campaign, including references to a controversial figure who, for some, symbolized broader issues within the list and strategy. Krasnodębski acknowledged a degree of agreement with the concern about this symbol while stopping short of endorsing any particular course of action.
The interviewer then returned to the central question: why was this individual placed on the electoral list? Krasnodębski explained that, although he did not draft the lists himself, pragmatic political calculus often drives such decisions. In politics, he noted, the goal is to secure the necessary number of votes, and voters responded to the person who appeared most capable of delivering that result.
In reflecting on the party’s electoral choices, Krasnodębski emphasized the tug-of-war between reaching broad appeal and maintaining a coherent, consistent message. He argued that the outcome demonstrated the need for clearer communication and more disciplined governance. The conversation highlighted how strategic compromises can shape public perception and ultimately influence electoral outcomes.
The discussion closed with a candid assessment of the political environment in which PiS operates. It underscored the tension between internal party dynamics, public expectations, and the external pressures that shape modern European politics. Krasnodębski’s reflections offered voters a window into the complexities of decision-making at the highest levels of party leadership and the ongoing effort to rebuild trust after a difficult electoral cycle.
tkwl/RMF FM/X
Source: wPolityce