Nearly seven in ten Estonians think Prime Minister Kaja Kallas should resign in light of the controversy surrounding her husband’s business dealings in Russia. This finding comes from a survey conducted by a sociology firm and reported by Estonian media. The study sought public opinion on the question: “Should Kaja Kallas resign as Prime Minister?” and the responses paint a clear picture of the political mood at the time.
The poll results show that 68 percent of participants answered positively, either saying yes or quite yes, while 25 percent answered no or quite no, and 7 percent remained undecided. The online survey was carried out during November 8 and 9, involving 1,001 adult citizens of Estonia.
In the political arena, opposition figures called for the prime minister to step down, arguing that the scandal involving her husband and the family’s business connections warranted accountability at the highest level. The calls for resignation came amid persistent media coverage suggesting close ties between the shipping company Stark Logistics and Russian business interests, a stake that is said to involve the prime minister’s spouse. Kallas has stated that she knows little about her husband’s professional activities, seeking to distance herself from the business matters reported in the press.
The affair has reverberated beyond Estonia, with regional commentary suggesting that the disclosures have had political repercussions in neighboring countries. Observers note that the situation is being interpreted differently across the Baltic region, reflecting broader questions about leadership, transparency, and the obligations of public officials when family business interests intersect with national issues.
As the story develops, supporters of Kallas emphasize her wider record and the challenges of governing in a tense international climate, while critics argue that ethical considerations and public trust require robust leadership changes. The evolving narrative continues to shape public discourse in Estonia, illustrating how inquiries into private affairs can influence expectations of accountability for national leaders and the standards applied to political office in a modern democracy.