Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization (AEOI) chairman Mohammad Eslami has provided an update on the IAEA mission, explaining that inspectors are in Tehran for their second day of verification visits and have conducted thorough inspections at designated nuclear facilities. The statement emphasizes a continuing cooperative process and underscores the importance of transparency as international oversight remains active in the region. The remarks reiterate a clear expectation that Iran will engage openly with IAEA personnel and that the agency’s technical review steps are proceeding in line with established international norms.
According to Eslami, IAEA representatives are presently in Tehran and have been involved in sustained discussions since the previous day. He noted that the delegation visited key facilities and carried out a series of inspections designed to verify compliance with international safeguards. The description paints a picture of routine, methodical work aimed at confirming the peaceful applications of Iran’s nuclear program and ensuring that all activities are properly documented and subject to independent verification.
Eslami stressed a firm stance on cooperation, stating that Tehran will not allow any lapses in collaboration with the IAEA. The message signals an insistence on continuous access for inspectors and a commitment to timely, transparent reporting. The remarks also suggest a focus on maintaining steady dialogue with the IAEA’s mission, with a view toward reducing any misconceptions about Tehran’s intentions and ensuring that technical results are clearly communicated to the international community.
The IAEA has not issued a public comment on the latest information regarding its staff visits to Iran, leaving room for official clarification from the agency to accompany the ongoing on-site work. Observers note that this silence can reflect the careful, professional handling of sensitive safety and verification matters, while analysts watch for any formal statements that might accompany the inspections as they progress.
Earlier reporting indicated that Iran had faced sharp criticism from the IAEA over what critics described as an unreliable assessment of alleged violations at a nuclear facility. Eslami responded by criticizing the conduct of IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi, arguing that certain statements and approaches lacked ethical grounding. The broader context includes prior calls from Britain, Germany, the United States, and France urging Iran to meet its international obligations and to demonstrate unwavering commitment to the safeguards regime that governs civilian nuclear work, a framework designed to prevent diversion toward weapons development.
In the IAEA’s official declarations, Tehran indicated that it would inform the Board of Governors if necessary about the scope of Iran’s uranium enrichment activities. Independent reporting has noted a reported enrichment level reaching up to 84 percent, an enrichment temperature that sits just below the threshold commonly associated with weapon-grade material. Bloomberg cited two unnamed senior diplomats in presenting those numbers, underscoring the ongoing sensitivity of enrichment data and the geopolitical dimensions attached to any fluctuation in the program’s reported figures. The overall tone of the coverage reflects the complexity of balancing verification, diplomacy, and domestic policy as Iran navigates its obligations under international oversight, while global observers monitor whether the inspections yield improvements in transparency and trust between Tehran and the IAEA.