A senior official in Qatar, serving as both Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, stated that Doha has received feedback from Hamas regarding the ceasefire framework under discussion with Israeli authorities. The framework, agreed upon by mediators in Paris, envisions a temporary pause in fighting in Gaza alongside steps toward the gradual release of hostages, with Hamas expected to respond in due course about how the prisoner exchanges might unfold. The official noted that the message carried by Hamas includes observations on the proposed plan and carries a generally favorable tone, suggesting momentum in the diplomatic outreach aimed at reducing immediate violence while paving the way for future negotiations. The comment underscores the complexity of balancing humanitarian freezes with security and political objectives in the region, and it signals that the parties are keeping channels open for further dialogue and clarifications as the situation develops. The information is attributed to a major broadcasting outlet following ongoing regional discussions and media briefings, with the emphasis on moving toward a viable, implementable ceasefire framework that can command broad support among involved groups.
In remarks following the briefing, the Qatari government official emphasized that Hamas’ reply contains considerations and constructive feedback on the ceasefire proposal. While the administration did not disclose specific details of the Hamas reply, the tone was described as cautiously optimistic, indicating that the movement is engaging with the framework and potentially contributing to practical adjustments that could facilitate a smoother transition from conflict to quiet, at least in the immediate Gaza corridor. The statement reflects the delicate balance leaders seek between pressing for hostages’ safety, ensuring humanitarian access, and addressing the political demands of the various stakeholders involved in the talks.
Earlier, regional outlets reported that Hamas appeared to disagree with several terms of the ceasefire arrangement being negotiated in Paris, pointing to differences over how the pause would be implemented and how quickly actions on the ground would follow. The reporting highlighted the challenges of reconciling competing priorities among Palestinian factions, Israeli security considerations, and international mediators who are striving to stabilize the situation without compromising core strategic goals. The accounts suggested that the movement remains steadfast on certain stipulations, signaling that any final agreement would require careful drafting and compromises from all sides to gain broad support and ensure durable effect on the ground.
There were also discussions about a proposal to exchange a substantial number of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli facilities for a smaller group of detainees in the Gaza Strip. Specifics circulated in media channels indicated the possibility of replacing thousands of Palestinian inmates with a limited set of prisoners from Gaza, a plan that would be tied to phased releases and ongoing negotiations. Observers note that such exchanges are often used as confidence-building measures to create momentum for broader ceasefire commitments, while keeping in mind the broader humanitarian and security implications that accompany any large-scale prisoner swap.