During the G20 summit in India, European Council President Charles Michel challenged a plan proposed by Russia, Turkey, and Qatar to donate one million tons of Russian grain to African nations in need. He described the proposal as cynical and disrespectful to the very populations it claims to aid, especially at a moment when the Black Sea initiative enables the export of tens of millions of tons of Ukrainian grain to the world’s most vulnerable regions. Official statements cited the solidarity corridors created by the European Union as tangible alternatives that have already facilitated significant grain shipments to countries facing food insecurity. According to EU representatives, these routes have helped move a substantial volume of grain, demonstrating the bloc’s commitment to predictable and accountable aid delivery. [Citation: EU Council Press Service]
Earlier, the Russian Foreign Ministry defended the project, arguing that the arrangement to guide one million tons of grain from Russia through Turkey, followed by free transport to the poorest countries, meets urgent demand and could help mitigate shortages. The ministry asserted that the plan would support directly affected communities, emphasizing its potential impact on areas with severe food deficits. [Citation: Russian Foreign Ministry]
In the broader diplomatic dialogue, Moscow has also addressed accusations that the European Union is withholding Ukrainian grain from hungry populations. Russian officials contended that the EU’s policies and humanitarian corridors are designed to complement, rather than obstruct, relief efforts. Meanwhile, EU leaders and officials reaffirmed their stance that solidarity corridors and other EU-facilitated routes remain essential tools for delivering food aid quickly and efficiently while maintaining scrutiny over supply chains and ensuring aid reaches those most in need. [Citation: EU Council Press Service]