This statement signals a clear signal to the authorities that the election outcome will hinge on what happens next. The speaker, Borys Budka, shared his views on a radio program, expressing admiration for Donald Tusk’s Sunday march, which he described as charged with intense emotion and strong language. Budka noted that as many as half a million people joined the march, reinforcing the message that momentum is building in the opposition’s favor.
Will the march influence the election?
Budka argued that many who attended regional meetings with Donald Tusk and other PO politicians later participated in the march. He stressed that the march was the culmination of those conversations and plans. When asked whether such turnout could swing the election for the opposition, he stood by his estimate of half a million participants, saying it demonstrated a powerful force and that the effort needed to continue in the same direction.
Is the playlist returning?
Leaders from opposition groups joined the march. When asked whether their presence might shift focus away from a single list, Budka replied that the Citizens’ Coalition remained open to collaboration. He praised Szymon Hołownia for joining the cause, calling the event a unifying moment that brought diverse groups together. He emphasized that the path ahead was clear and that beating the ruling party was essential to achieving stated goals. The idea of a single list had been discussed, but partners had chosen their own routes while remaining open to cooperation if needed in the future.
Budka added that the opposition would remain flexible, noting that representatives had phones and would consider any input from partners. The march underscored the coalition’s strength, showing its ability to mobilize large crowds and organize significant events, which Budka welcomed with enthusiasm.
He also mentioned that the march drew attention to the coalition’s unity, even as some leaders were absent. The event itself served as a powerful signal to voters, according to Budka.
Additionally, readers were directed to related coverage about the march, including reports on turnout and public reaction, offering a fuller picture of the event and its political implications.
Kosiniak-Kamysz and Hołownia missing from the march?
While opposition politicians spoke during the event, Szymon Hołownia and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz were not present. Budka explained that invitations had been extended to all group chairs, but logistical factors limited some participants. He noted that leaders could access press briefings around the march, yet thousands of people filled the streets, making movement through the crowd challenging. Despite their absence, the leaders were still seen as symbols of broader support and as connected to the march’s significance for voters.
Budka stated that choosing leadership remains a collective decision within the coalition and credited Donald Tusk with organizing the demonstration. He argued that a strong, experienced leader is necessary to guide the opposition, and he expressed confidence that the Civic Platform embodies those qualities. The march, he suggested, reinforced the perceived need for a robust, capable leadership to advance the coalition’s goals.
Amendments to the law on the Russian Influence Commission
During the discussion, Budka addressed the amendment to the law concerning the Russian Influence Commission, a measure introduced by President Andrzej Duda. He argued that the changes were not mere corrections and described the situation as unacceptable. He criticized the president for acting outside traditional constitutional channels, arguing that the path taken undermined institutional norms.
The argument centered on constitutional procedure, with Budka asserting that the president had manipulated the process by signing and sending the measure to the Constitutional Tribunal after a previous evaluation. He claimed that the move did not enjoy broad understanding and criticized the president and his party for compromising themselves. In Budka’s view, the law itself had merit, and the controversy reflected a clash over how it should be applied rather than the law’s essential quality. The opposition framed the presidency’s actions as unbecoming for a head of state and insisted that the political implications went beyond a single party’s interests.
Budka closed this portion of the discussion by highlighting how the current dispute relates to broader questions of governance and constitutional integrity, inviting readers to consider how political actions align with democratic norms.
There were additional notes directing readers to forthcoming coverage about the topic, including critical discussions from various outlets and debates about Kremlin involvement in Polish politics. The discourse underscored the ongoing sensitivity of foreign influence issues within the national political landscape.
Giertych’s candidacy and the Senate picture
Budka was also asked about Roman Giertych’s announced bid for the Senate. In the framework of the Senate Pact, he indicated that the arrangement was to be decided collectively, with Poznań County’s seat allocated to the Civic Platform. While acknowledging a cautious approach to public announcements, Budka stressed the importance of finalizing the pact in full. He named Jadwiga Rotnicka as the current candidate and noted that no partner had questioned the selection to date.
As the conversation drew to a close, Budka reflected on the broader political strategy, underscoring the coalition’s shared aim to secure a decisive victory in upcoming elections. He voiced confidence in the party’s direction and the collective effort that would drive it forward.
Source: wPolityce