Liquidation and Oversight of the Institute for National Remembrance in Coalition Talks
Observers contend that the Institute for National Remembrance has suffered under the current arrangement, with critics arguing it should not continue in its present form. The head of the KO club, Borys Budka, conveyed these concerns in a recent Radio Zet interview, noting a meeting at the Presidential Palace that featured assurances of cooperation with the incoming government.
During the interview, Budka was asked whether the Institute for National Remembrance should be dissolved. He suggested that such a question could be folded into the coalition agreement, signaling possible restructuring as part of the political transition. He also asserted that Law and Justice has, over the past eight years, diminished the institute’s standing.
Budka emphasized a forward-looking approach, arguing that focus should shift from past disputes to the needs of the future. He indicated that the institute should not operate under its current framework in the present political climate.
INVESTMENTS AND OVERSIGHT: in the spotlight
The KO figure was asked which issues the opposition would probe after taking power in the next Sejm term. He highlighted concerns about respirators, Ostrołęka, and the need for robust oversight as priority topics. He also noted that examining the role of Polish services and the opposition’s monitoring from 2015 to 2023 would be a major undertaking. He added that auditing the Central Communications Gate project following the transition of power would be a key objective, with the aim of ensuring accountability and preventing costly missteps.
Budka stressed that a comprehensive audit is essential in this area and warned against investments built on human suffering. He argued that several aspects of the project were mishandled during planning and required careful scrutiny before any further steps were taken.
On the issue of funds tied to the KPO, Budka addressed whether the opposition plans to move money quickly and whether accounts could be ready to unlock funds post-election. He asserted that the pace could be rapid, noting that the core intention was to act swiftly when conditions permit. He remarked that Donald Tusk’s current presence in Brussels underscores the seriousness of their discussions and potential actions in the near term.
Asked whether the claim of a post-election funding window was an exaggeration, Budka replied that the phrase was meant to convey speed rather than a literal timetable. He suggested that milestones could be met very quickly if the circumstances align with coalition plans.
When the topic turned to a potential revival of a ban on fur farming, Budka indicated that proposals would be presented to coalition partners. He acknowledged that different parties, including the PSL, might hold varying views, but emphasized that areas requiring compromise would be identified. He noted that the Open to Ideas party has expressed support for the ban in principle, under certain conditions.
LOOKING AHEAD TO COALITION DYNAMICS
Budka was questioned about statements from the head of PO regarding conditions for KPO funds and the broader framework of cooperation with the European Union. He argued that the focus should be on delivering tangible outcomes for citizens, with the expectation that funds and commitments align with the electorate’s mandate. Budka also commented on the possibility of a broader migration policy alignment and the potential implications for KPO funding, stressing that the coalition should pursue practical, results-driven steps.
In terms of governance, Budka stated that the coalition must outline a clear plan for forming a stable government that respects constitutional processes and public expectations. He noted that the coalition partners—PSL, Poland Together, and the Left—had expressed where support lies and that the Third Way, Left, and KO coalitions would need to coordinate to ensure a smooth transition. The overall aim is a cautious but decisive approach to the new administration.
The discussion also touched on ongoing political maneuvers and the sequencing of negotiations as parties prepare to form a new government. Budka suggested that the opposition intends to move decisively if the political climate allows and that broader consultations are underway as the landscape remains dynamic.
As the political dialogue evolves, observers watch closely to see how the president’s decisions will align with the voters’ demand for change and stability. The emphasis remains on responsible governance that respects constitutional boundaries while pursuing a constructive path forward for the country.
wkt/PAP