The head of Poland’s Permanent Representation to the European Union, Piotr Serafin, is also an employee of the European Council, a situation that has prompted claims of a conflict of interest by PiS politician Szymon Szynkowski vel Sęk. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Paweł Wroński dismissed the accusation, saying Serafin is currently on unpaid leave from a technical body and that no conflict exists.
Doubts about Piotr Serafin
In December, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that the current Permanent Representative of Poland to the EU, Andrzej Sadoś, had been recalled to Poland and relieved of his duties, with Piotr Serafin taking the helm in Brussels as Minister Plenipotentiary. This change sparked skepticism among PiS lawmakers, who argued that the rearrangement, executed under time pressure, bordered on being extralegal in nature.
READ ALSO:
— Andrzej Sadoś recalled from duty and replaced by Piotr Serafin as Poland’s Permanent Representative to the EU
— Behind-the-scenes look at Piotr Serafin’s move to Brussels, described by critics as political maneuvering
— Spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs suggested that Piotr Serafin would better represent Polish interests in the EU, raising questions about the process
Actions ‘contrary to procedures’
Szynkowski vel Sęk, a former head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and former Minister of European Affairs, later stepped back from the initial public position. He stated on social media that the previous arrangement indicated Serafin’s continued role as Poland’s Permanent Representative to the EU, while insisting the case involved actions that did not align with standard procedures.
From his perspective, Szynkowski vel Sęk flagged a potential conflict of interest in the appointment. He noted that Piotr Serafin was installed outside the usual procedure to head the Permanent Representation and would advocate for Polish interests in the EU Council while remaining an employee of the Council on unpaid leave.
He called for urgent clarification of various legal, procedural, and personnel questions within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and, together with MPs Paweł Jabłoński and Marcin Przydacz, announced a parliamentary intervention aimed at obtaining more information.
Serafin on holiday
The issue was addressed by Paweł Wroński, the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and a former journalist for Gazeta Wyborcza. He emphasized that parliamentary oversight is allowed and that the ministry would provide the necessary documents when requested. He stated that Serafin had taken unpaid leave from the General Secretariat of the European Council, a body described as technical in nature and not party to ongoing negotiations.
Wroński added that there should be no conflict of interest, given Serafin’s absence from negotiations and the Secretariat’s limited capability to influence outcomes. He urged PiS MPs to identify any irregularities and point them out clearly. He also asserted that, according to the ministry, everything was conducted in accordance with the law.
Additional commentary appeared in related coverage suggesting that the Prime Minister should appoint a permanent representative to the EU and describing the Brussels environment as a site of political theater. Several discussions of Serafin’s movements through Brussels and their broader implications were noted by observers.
Endnotes reflect the ongoing dialogue in courts of diplomacy and political commentary, with public figures and media voices contributing to the debate and offering varying interpretations of duty and procedure in the European arena. The discussion continues as parliamentary and ministry officials navigate questions about representation, transparency, and the proper channels for appointments in EU institutions. [citation needed: wPolityce]