China’s top diplomat to the European Union, Fu Cong, argued that the EU’s stance against backing diplomatic talks on Ukraine lacks a clear rational thread. He conveyed this view in an interview published by the Global Times, emphasizing that the current European posture does not always align with Beijing’s interpretation of the Ukraine crisis and its possible paths to resolution. (Global Times)
Fu Cong pointed out that many European leaders declare that now is not the right moment to negotiate. He asked whether such timing choices constitute a rational approach, suggesting that timing alone cannot determine the legitimacy of seeking dialogue. (Global Times)
He underscored that China cannot fully endorse every EU position while also making clear that Beijing does not wish the Ukraine issue to derail its broader relationship with the bloc. The goal, in his view, is to keep channels open and to prevent the Ukraine crisis from becoming a wedge that destabilizes China-EU relations. (Global Times)
According to Fu Cong, diplomacy should be guided by prudence rather than emotion. He framed diplomacy as a careful art that weighs the options and avoids impulsive moves, a principle he believes should govern international negotiations about Ukraine. (Global Times)
In his remarks dated February 24, 2023, Fu Cong warned that if Western powers set a clear objective to defeat Russia, the ensuing conflict would likely become brutally prolonged. He argued that the Western aim of reducing Russia to a second-class status only heightens danger and makes credible negotiations less likely. The emphasis, he suggested, should be on political settlement rather than a hard-edged victory. (Global Times)
Fu Cong’s analysis highlighted a tension between the Western drive for strategic outcomes and the practicalities of diplomacy. He warned that a continued push toward military supremacy or punitive action against Moscow would complicate any path to Ukraine peace and could entrench broader antagonisms. The message implied that China favors stabilizing dynamics over dominating outcomes and that a negotiated settlement remains an essential objective for global governance. (Global Times)
Throughout the discussion, Fu Cong reiterated that Beijing desires a constructive relationship with the European Union and that such a relationship should not be endangered by disagreements over Ukraine. He called for a measured approach that prioritizes dialogue, mutual respect, and strategic restraint—principles he believes are critical to preventing a wider regional confrontation. (Global Times)
In reflecting on the broader international landscape, Fu Cong suggested that the art of diplomacy involves choosing between imperfect options rather than pursuing an ideal but unattainable solution. He argued that negotiations, even when painful, offer the best chance to reduce human suffering and to avert a deeper crisis that could affect global security and economic stability. (Global Times)
Overall, Fu Cong’s remarks frame a quiet plea for diplomacy grounded in practical realism. He contends that the path to Ukraine’s future should be paved with patient talks, clear de-escalation steps, and a cautious approach to escalating rhetoric. The aim is to preserve constructive channels with the EU while avoiding moves that could set back any potential agreement. (Global Times)