The discussion on television touched on the detention of soldiers who had fired warning shots near the border. Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz acknowledged that he did not have information about the arrest or the use of direct coercive measures such as handcuffs. He stated he knew nothing about any formal detention, while confirming that an incident had occurred and that authorities would examine the use of weapons involved.
In the program, the journalist Monika Olejnik asked whether President Andrzej Duda should be informed about the detention decisions. The exchange highlighted questions about the obligation of the military authorities to disclose details of arrests and the appropriate channels for informing higher offices in such cases.
According to Kosiniak-Kamysz, the Commander-in-Chief of the Military Police is not bound to provide information about arrests in these situations. He emphasized that there is no obligation or standard practice requiring immediate or routine disclosure of arrests to the public in every incident. He added that while he was aware that an incident had occurred, he did not have knowledge of any arrest or the use of handcuffs in connection with that event.
The remarks raise questions about the scope of responsibility and transparency in military policing. What exactly did the minister know about the incident, and what has been shared with the exercise of command within the armed forces? The issue centers on how information is handled in cases involving weapons use and potential coercive measures. The discussion implies there are differing interpretations of when information should be released to the public and higher authorities. There are observable implications for how military operations and discipline are communicated to lawmakers and the public, and for how future incidents might be handled to avoid misunderstandings.
READ ALSO: Kosiniak-Kamysz and Tomczyk are seen by some as diverting attention from concerns about blasphemy. The reference notes that in Błaszczak’s era the military police also used handcuffs in certain circumstances. This historical contrast is cited to suggest that practices have varied over time and between leaderships. The discussion thus touches on continuity and change within military policing methods and the reporting of those methods.
TVN24/cat
Source: wPolityce