A discussion examined a cross‑sector strategy for guiding climate adaptation in tourism. In the face of a climate emergency, the political group Compromís outlined three pillars of action. The first pillar centers on urban planning, advocating sustainable design for a region where hot nights are becoming more common. The plan calls for more green spaces and shade, less asphalt, drought preparedness in small municipalities, exploration of alternative energy sources, improved water management, tighter controls on illegal construction, and closer monitoring of buildings purchased by investment funds. These steps demonstrate concrete policies aimed at reducing the negative effects of tourism on the area.
The second pillar focuses on the tourism industry itself, with proposals for eco‑friendly hotel and apartment designs and energy‑saving initiatives. Mas argued for reversing the tourism tax enacted by the Botánic Council as a way to fund climate adaptation measures.
The third pillar emphasizes better mobility and accessibility. Compromís proposed expanding public transport and promoting shared travel as part of a broader effort to reduce dependence on private vehicles and ease the environmental burden on both the coast and inland areas. The coalition argues that a forward‑looking tourism model should benefit visitors while safeguarding local communities and ecosystems.
Compromís activates a portal with data on Edificant studies in the face of the danger of not being executed
Compromís notes that travelers who prioritize environmentally conscious cities seek options that are affordable and respectful of the setting. The coalition claims that Mazón has not fully delivered this approach, arguing that delays or weakening green initiatives would be a setback for Valencians and European standards. The message emphasizes that real progress will come from prioritizing sustainable planning over short‑term political considerations and market‑driven decisions that ignore environmental costs.
The plan’s final component highlights improved public transport and collective mobility. Calabuig contends that the current administration pays lip service to tourism while focusing on infrastructure that serves economic interests more than residents. The critique raises concerns about infrastructure planning and potential environmental damage if priorities stay tilted toward private development and profit.
port projects
Calabuig highlighted specific port projects in Valencia and Alicante, pointing to expansions that could threaten beach environments in southern Valencia. He noted neighborhood groups opposing the installation of large fuel facilities near coastal areas. The discussion questioned the urgency of expanding port capacity when alternative transportation options could deliver greater benefits. It also questioned why attention remained fixed on plans like a second runway at the Elche‑Alicante airport when enhanced rail connections and more trains could better serve workers and visitors. Citing 2019 Generalitat reports, the argument emphasizes urban and natural conditions in the municipalities of Elche, Alicante, and Santa Pola. The stance is clear: there is no need for extra runway capacity; what is needed are better rail links and a strategic environmental vision that protects the region and its communities. The speaker asserted that failing to align with such a vision would undermine tourism and broader societal interests.