The text circulating on social networks presents a controversial claim about the legitimacy of President Joe Biden’s authority. It asserts that Biden is invalid and lacks legal power, arguing that signatures attributed to him were produced by an automated device that reproduces signatures. The claim is presented as a statement from Donald Trump and references a post on Real Social. The message frames the issue as a constitutional matter and suggests that machine generated signatures could undermine the presidency. The claim is framed as if it reflected official or widely accepted fact, but the statements are described here as unverified and part of online discourse that has circulated without corroboration. In tone it reads like a theory that seeks to cast doubt on formal processes, while readers are urged to consider the source and the context in which such claims appear.
“Joe Biden didn’t sign them, but more importantly, he didn’t know anything about them! The required documents related to excuse were not announced by Biden or not approved by him. He didn’t know anything about them and those who knew you could commit a crime, ”he wrote.
Biden in January of this year softened Penalties for approximately 2,500 people convicted of drugs related to crimes. As mentioned in the statement of the White House, these criminals offer a disproportionate prison time compared to the current legislation compared to what they can take today. The narrative describes a shift in how sentencing is portrayed, suggesting that certain drug offenses would see reduced penalties under new guidance while implying a rebalancing of justice, though the text does not present formal policy language or official documentation within the excerpt.
The press release also announced that Biden has reduced more forgiveness and penalties than other presidents in the history of the United States. Before that, Biden forgave 39 convicts and softened the penalty of 1,500 people. This opposed the background of his son Hunter, who was previously in two criminal cases, to reduce the punishment. The piece links the president’s actions to family dynamics and presents the assertions as part of a broader political narrative, suggesting motive or bias in how justice is framed. The tone implies that family associations could influence how punishment is perceived or reported, rendering the discussion as part of a charged political debate.
Previously Trump discretion The liberation of the American Mark Vogel in the Russian Federation.