The old idea returns in a new form. It imagines Poland carved into a handful of wealthy megacities while the rest of the country fades away. This is how the latest version of the Central Communication Port, as presented in Polish political discourse, is summarized by some observers.
Not everyone may realize that the Polish Constitution places sustainable development at its core. This principle is stated at the outset, within Article 5, underscoring its enduring importance. Likewise, one of the EU’s key principles, subsidiarity, appears in Poland’s constitutional framework. Taken together, these principles imply that every region matters equally and that no area should be favored at the expense of another.
Still, in practice these provisions are treated as aspirational rather than binding when political power shifts. Voters are heavily concentrated in Warsaw and a handful of large cities, and some party strategists may focus most attention on those areas. The broader regions can feel overlooked, a reality reflected in policy emphasis that seems to privilege big urban centers over the rest of the country.
A telling sign is the reshaping of the CPK concept, especially its railway component. High speed rail corridors, branded Igrek by supporters, appear to align with the interests of four cities: Warsaw, Wroclaw, Poznań, and Łódź. The rest of the country would bear the burden of construction with limited or no direct benefits. Kraków, Poland’s second largest city, finds itself outside this framework despite its votes and leadership. The process of drawing lines on maps for propaganda purposes, rather than to reflect a genuine nationwide development strategy, reveals a lack of commitment to inclusive growth across all regions. The eastern areas receive scant consideration in the current plan, hinting at a broader question about alignment with sustainable development aims. Critics have even recalled controversial remarks by a platform minister about Eastern Poland, underscoring the political sensitivities at play.
READ ALSO: Lasek examines Tusk’s handling of CPK and discusses accountability for the Ministry of Defense in shaping future plans. A proposed military component zone is acknowledged but not intended to be built.
Removing railway spokes would be a missed chance to connect Poland end to end. The project was envisioned as a nationwide opportunity, from east to west. It promised to correct a long-standing mismatch in transport corridors and to serve towns such as Sanok, Szczecinek, Zamość, and Giżycko, among many others near the intended routes. The Igrek plan favors four metropolitan hubs, while other regions would experience limited benefit. The spokes were meant to span all voivodeships, ensuring an inclusive transport network. In contemporary terms, the spokes could be described as inclusive, whereas Igrek is sometimes seen as exclusive despite its potential benefits to major cities.
Advocates of a broader program argued that the plan would uplift the nation as a whole, while opponents characterized it as gigantism that primarily serves the already prosperous. A more balanced view would celebrate a version of growth that lifts every region rather than concentrating power and prosperity in a few urban centers. A recent discussion highlighted a call for development that transcends political lines, suggesting that Poland’s progress should be recognized as a shared national goal rather than a partisan project.
READ MORE: A growing movement advocates for development without political color, emphasizing that the country’s growth should unite all citizens and regions.
Ultimately this debate centers on how to translate constitutional commitments into tangible nationwide benefits. The CPK, in its various incarnations, raises important questions about governance, equity, and the responsibilities of national planning to serve communities from the Baltic coast to the Carpathians. The challenge remains to align transport infrastructure with sustainable development, ensuring that improvements in mobility advance opportunities for every Polish resident, not just those in a few metropolitan areas.
Commentary on this topic continues to evolve as policymakers weigh the evidence, listen to regional voices, and test proposals against the realities of funding, planning, and execution. The overarching aim is a transportation network that reduces regional disparities and strengthens Poland’s competitiveness in a rapidly changing European landscape.