The United States secretary of state voiced strong concern over Azerbaijan’s recent military moves in Nagorno-Karabakh, signaling alarm about the potential consequences for regional stability. The statement underscored Washington’s expectation that all parties refrain from actions that could escalate tensions and threaten civilians in the sector.
Washington has urged Baku to halt any ongoing operations at once and to return to a path of de-escalation. The call reflects a broader interest in preserving ceasefire commitments and ensuring humanitarian protection for those affected by the conflict in and around Nagorno-Karabakh.
Reports indicate that Azerbaijani forces crossed the line of contact in several locations around Nagorno-Karabakh, raising concerns about shifting control on the ground and the risk of renewed clashes. The development prompted international scrutiny and a demand for careful restraint from all sides while renewed negotiations are explored.
In parallel, the status of Nagorno-Karabakh, an entity long disputed in the region, remains a focal point of international diplomacy. The broader international community continues to emphasize the importance of negotiations aimed at stabilizing the area and addressing the concerns of all communities involved, without resorting to force.
On September 19, Azerbaijan announced the launch of what it described as an anti-terrorist operation in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Defense Ministry issued warnings about potential threats to residents and called for heightened vigilance during the operation, highlighting the human impact of conflict in this area.
Armenia’s defense authorities reported that Azerbaijani missiles were fired in violation of the ceasefire along the line of contact with Nagorno-Karabakh. Officials in Yerevan framed the operation as a strategic move and stressed that its aim includes broader regional involvement, a characterization that has drawn international attention and concern about escalation.
Meanwhile, discussions between Armenia and Azerbaijan continue to revolve around the mutual recognition of each other’s territorial integrity and the prospect of lasting peace. The dialogue reflects an ongoing effort to reconcile competing claims and to create a framework for durable arrangements that respect the interests and safety of all communities in the region.