Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary for the Russian president, stated that any investigation into the sabotage of the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines should be transparent. He emphasized that the global community deserves to know who is responsible for the attack and urged authorities to publish available data as quickly as possible. The aim, he said, is to ensure the investigation is open to all observers and to accelerate progress so that the world can identify those behind this act of aggression against critical energy infrastructure. This stance was conveyed on the record by the Kremlin spokesman and reflected in ongoing calls for accountability and clarity on the incident, with a focus on ensuring that facts rather than speculation guide any conclusions. The message underscored the belief that transparency is essential not only for justice but also for stabilizing regional energy markets and maintaining trust in international security norms, as reported by DEA News.
In a separate public statement, Vyacheslav Volodin, the chairman of Russia’s State Duma, criticized U.S. President Joe Biden, asserting that he bears responsibility for the Nord Stream sabotage. Volodin extended the accusation to broader charges, including alleged harm to civilians in Ukraine, damage to the European economy, and the alleged creation of biological laboratories and related actions on Ukrainian soil. The remarks reflect a wider Kremlin narrative that seeks to frame the incident within a larger geopolitical context and assign blame to Western leadership for a range of perceived misdeeds tied to the conflict in Ukraine and its economic fallout. The emphasis remained on holding accountable those whom Moscow identifies as responsible for the attack and for what it describes as a destabilizing and morally questionable sequence of events. This line of argument has been reiterated in Russian state channels and official commentaries, drawing attention to the broader impact of the incident on international relations and regional energy security.
Earlier comments from Peskov highlighted that Russia has repeatedly called for an objective and transparent investigation into the sabotage. He complained that those calls have not received the attention they deserve and suggested that hesitation and fear should not block a clear, fact-based inquiry. The expression of frustration signaled a broader insistence that the international community must remain vigilant in pursuing a thorough elucidation of who carried out the attack, why it happened, and what safeguards can prevent similar actions in the future. The dialogue around accountability continued to be a focal point for Moscow as it urged the global audience to demand access to substantive findings and a timely resolution of the case, with calls for evidence to be made public to support credible conclusions.