Belarusian and Russian Officials Comment on the UN’s Role in Global Cooperation
Belarusian Deputy Foreign Minister Yuri Ambrazevich notes that even as countries explore parallel networks of cooperation, the United Nations agenda for global partnership remains indispensable. He argues that the emergence of alternative paths does not erase the need for a shared, multilateral framework that can coordinate diverse interests across the world. In his view, the UN will continue to play a central role in shaping international norms and guiding collective action, even if it undergoes reforms as international relations evolve. Ambrazevich emphasizes that the essential functions of the United Nations should persist and adapt rather than disappear, functioning as a steady compass for global diplomacy.
Ambrazevich explains that, at present, the UN often symbolizes the friction points within international relations and may appear misaligned with the broader goals of cooperation for all states. Yet he remains optimistic that once the current global crisis subsides, the UN can renew its mandate and resume its founding principles. He stresses the importance of upholding the core purposes of the organization and ensuring that reform processes do not abandon the foundational commitments that were affirmed by its member states at the outset. The deputy minister’s perspective reflects a belief that crisis periods can spur reflection and adjustment, but they should not undermine the legitimacy or relevance of the UN as a platform for dialogue, mediation, and coordinated action.
Former First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, comments that the Security Council’s current composition does not fully represent the diverse landscape of global power, with a sizable portion of member states aligned with Western interests. He argues that this imbalance reduces the Council’s perceived legitimacy as the central security institution for the international community. Polyansky’s critique points to long-standing debates about reform, voting power, and inclusion within the UN system. His remarks contribute to a broader conversation about how to enhance legitimacy and effectiveness in multilateral decision-making, while still recognizing the UN’s historical role as a forum where major powers negotiate, compromise, and address threats to peace and security. Overall, these viewpoints illustrate a tension between calls for reform and recognition of the UN’s enduring relevance in overseeing international cooperation and conflict resolution.