Mec. In a strong entry, Bartosz Lewandowski referred to the information revealed by the wPolityce.pl portal. This is about the action taken by Bodnar supporters to attack lawyer Krzysztof Wąsowski. “In such a situation, any lawyer can be eliminated if the prosecutor blithely states that the lawyer can be questioned as a witness,” the lawyer wrote. The already mentioned representative of Fr. Michał Olszewski, who shares an “interesting fact”. “I have just received a letter addressed to me as DEFENDER (Father Olszewski and Mr. Urszula) from the same Mr. Prosecutor who a moment earlier wanted to treat me as a TESTIMONY who would be prohibited from contacting the indicated suspects,” described lawyer Wąsowski.
Bodnar supporters want to get rid of Wąsowski!
As revealed by the wPolityce.pl portal. Bodnar’s supporters want to get rid of lawyer Krzysztof Wąsowski, defender of priest Michał Olszewski, among others. Prosecutor Woźniak’s letter, obtained through our website, is dated October 30. In it, the Public Prosecution Service recalls the decision of the Supreme Court in Warsaw, in which judge Fr. Olszewski and Urszula Dubejko contact other “witnesses” to the case. This topic was raised by Prosecutor Woźniak, who freely determines who is and who is not a witness in these proceedings.
(…) I would like to point out that the ban also applies to you. In such circumstances, your continued representation of suspects (…) leads to negative procedural consequences for the indicated suspects (…) – in the event of contact with the suspects or in the unreliable exercise of their right of defense – in lack of such contact, so that you can properly represent the interests of your clients
– we read in the bizarre letter from prosecutor Woźniak.
Defense lawyers (…) may not be questioned as witnesses. Therefore, no lawyer can be a witness in a particular case
– writes lawyer Krzysztof Wąsowski in response to the above-mentioned letter, the contents of which became known on the portal wPolityce.pl, at the same time reminding Woźniak that he has been Father Olszewski’s representative since March 26, i.e. from the day of the arrest of the priest.
How could it happen that the neo-national prosecutor’s office did not question the lawyer as a witness before arresting Fr. Olszewski and Mrs Dubejko? According to lawyer Wąsowski, the intention is to remove him from this process.
CHECK THE DETAILS: WE ANNOUNCEMENT. Bodnar supporters want to get rid of Wąsowski! There is a strong response from the defender of Fr. Olszewski!
Strong commentary from lawyer Lewandowski
He later commented on the issue published on our website on social media lawyer Bartosz Lewandowski.
Did you know that in Poland in 2024 a way was found to eliminate a very good lawyer from one of the most important criminal cases for the government? I rub my eyes in surprise…
– wrote the lawyer in a powerful post.
Well, lawyer Krzysztof Wąsowski, whose clients recently paid the charges after successfully filing a complaint, received a letter from the prosecutor in charge of the Justice Fund case, indicating that…lawyer Wąsowski has no contact can have with his clients. So basically he should give up defense. How come? Such that the Public Prosecution Service – knowing that Mr. Wąsowski is the defender of the suspects – wanted to question him as a witness (sic❗️), although art. 178 point 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits this. And now the Public Prosecution Service claims that since the court has prohibited the suspect from contacting witnesses, he cannot even talk to them.
– lawyer Lewandowski summarized the case,
Again: lawyer Wąsowski took part in the proceedings, read the files, wrote an effective complaint, visited the pre-trial detention, but now – if they are free – he cannot defend his clients.
– he wrote.
As the lawyer added, “I thought I had seen a lot, but life can surprise you.”
In such a situation, any lawyer can be eliminated if the prosecutor blithely states that the lawyer can be questioned as a witness, while nothing has come of the hearing because the person summoned simply refuses to answer the questions.
– Lewandowski warned.
Mec. Wąsowski publishes a series of entries
Lawyer Wąsowski also spoke, whose response was published in an earlier publication.
I wondered what the prosecutor’s “idea” was in “forbidding” me from defending my clients. A certain newspaper comes to my rescue and today continues with the topic of “sock business”.
– he said.
As he explained in a series of contributions on the X platform, “the economic activity of the Profeto Foundation was not related to a grant from the Justice Fund.”
This grant was provided through another separate bank account (in accordance with the grant agreement) that was unrelated to the account the Foundation used for business purposes. Neither I nor my law firm handled the business relationships between Profeto Foundation and Many Mornings, Profeto and Wadas Group, or between Wadas Group and Many Mornings. As a side note, I would like to add that these relationships are protected by trade secrets
– we read.
I only became a lawyer for Wadas Group in April 2022 and represented this client in a dispute with Many Mornings in a matter related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (I’m proud of it… successfully so far…). The dispute is not about brokering or “trading” in socks. The company Przestrzenie Kultury Sp z o., in which I have 10% of the shares (and I founded it with my friend who took over 90%), was registered in February 2022 (which is easy to check in the National Court Register), i.e. two years after the start of the “sock business”. I have not sent an invoice to Przestrzenie Kultury (or my law firm). As a shareholder, I have not received a single zloty of profit from this company
– explained the priest’s representative. Olszewski.
There is no “participation” in the described “sock business” – not even as a representative or advisor to any of the parties to this “business” (let alone that I am not, even in the slightest degree, a “beneficiary ‘ was of this ‘business’). cases) (…) There is no description of the role of Father Michał Olszewski SCJ (and even more so my second mandate, Mrs Urszula Dubejko) in these cases. It seems that the author is completely satisfied with his own assumptions
– he added.
Why does lawyer Wąsowski mention this? Because, as he explained after a while, “in this context” he looks at “the prosecution’s attempts to appoint me as a defender of Fr. Michał and Mrs. Urszula in the famous proceedings conducted before the current Public Prosecutor’s Office.
The Public Prosecution Service contradicts itself!
Unfortunately it doesn’t end there. Mec. Krzysztof Wąsowski shared an “interesting fact” on the X platform.
I have just received a letter addressed to me as DEFENSE (Father Olszewski and Mr. Urszula) from the same Mr. Prosecutor, who a moment earlier wanted to treat me as a TESTIMONY who would be prohibited from contacting the indicated suspects.
– we read.
It may be funny (due to its grotesque nature), but given the actions of the Bodnarists there is no reason to laugh at all, on the contrary…
– ONLY WITH US. Echoes of the “GW” lampoon that Fr. Olszewski. Mec. Wąsowski: We document everything. I assure you, we will not forget you
– ONLY WITH US. What is the Public Prosecution Service doing regarding bail for the priest? Michael? Mec. Skwarzyński: The prosecutor said he did not question the origin of the money
OUR NEWS. Who is the judge who did not believe that Fr. Was Olszewski tortured? She is a member of a politicized association
olnk/wPolityce.pl/X
Source: wPolityce