The wPolityce.pl portal discovered that one of the defenders of Fr. Michał Olszewski, arrested in connection with the alleged Justice Fund scandal, has filed a request for intervention with the Ombudsman. In it, he raises numerous irregularities committed by Adam Bodnar’s nominees. The letter also discusses the shocking actions of investigators who seized donations from the faithful that did not come from the Fund. At the same time, the Public Prosecution Service has not decided to take out a mortgage on the real estate where the “Archipelago of Freedom” is located, financed by the Justice Fund.
READ ALSO: Defender of Fr. Olszewski unmasks the revelations of a Justice Fund official: ‘The witness has surprisingly little knowledge’
I ask the Ombudsman to intervene in the case of Fr. Fr. Michał Olszewski and the Profeto Foundation and participated in these proceedings both as the Polish Ombudsman, but also as the body specified in international treaties on the prohibition of torture. He points out that in this case all Profeto accounts have been seized, the majority of which come from donations for religious purposes – evangelization, but also for charity and healthcare activities. This concerns funds that in no way originate from the Justice Fund, but that have been seized by the Public Prosecution Service
– we read in the application of Dr. Michał Skwarzyński, one of Father Olszewski’s defenders.
This is a deliberate action and is intended to lead to Profeto’s bankruptcy, but is unnecessary as there are other effective measures to secure possible future claims.
– he adds.
The prosecutor brings charges of embezzlement of funds from the Justice Fund, while at the same time not securing the mortgage and real estate where Archipelago of Freedom is located, choosing the most painful method to secure the funds in all accounts. . The purpose of such an action is clearly evident. This is not about irregularities in the Archipelago of Freedom, but about leading to the bankruptcy of Profeto. The public prosecutor is aware that the construction work covered by the application has been completed, that the building is standing and that there is no risk of the property being lost. He does not even want to include a sales or mortgage ban in the land and mortgage register
– describes lawyer Skwarzyński.
Applications not accepted
Father Olszewski’s lawyer also describes the bizarre behavior of prosecutor Dariusz Korneluk, who was appointed head of the National Public Prosecutor’s Office in violation of the law.
Due to the fact that he does not receive sensible responses to my letters, such as to the request to exclude prosecutors, where prosecutor D. Korneluk made a decision unknown in the Code of Criminal Procedure “to leave the conclusions without consideration” , where he attacks me personally, he does not respond to the allegations in the extensive legal analysis
– we read in Michał Skwarzyński’s application to Prof. Marcin Wiącek, Commissioner for Human Rights.
Father Olszewski’s representative wants the Ombudsman to receive answers to the prosecutor’s questions. This includes: for securing accounts related to the “Profeto” activities. The lawyer also wants to know whether money has been released for the current business operations, as required by the Code of Civil Procedure, and why the security has not been provided on real estate, but on donations from ordinary people. The Ombudsman should also ask the person posing as a National Prosecutor whether an analysis has been made of the special legal protection of donations for religious services – evangelism, but also for charity and care activities.
The Public Prosecution Service makes it difficult
The attorney also raises other issues that are deeply troubling. He claims that the priest’s lawyers are not aware of the investigative activities, and that many of them are taking place without the participation of the defenders, despite a written request.
I was also unable to participate in the hearing as an attorney witness. Krzysztof Wąsowski, even though I was on the prosecutor’s office. The proceedings are being conducted by prosecutors who can certainly be excluded, and there are serious doubts as to whether they have the appropriate authority to do so – the so-called problem of the Attorney General, and in this case the request to close investigated by Dariusz Korneluk, who is in the same situation as the prosecutors of Investigative Team No. 2, so the issue of exclusion should be examined by one of the deputy prosecutors. attorneys general
– Michał Skwarzyński sums up.
The lawyer also claims that the case is a case of media lynching, and that the secret of the investigation is revealed by Tomasz Mraz and his lawyer, Roman Giertych.
The case of priest Michał Olszewski is beginning to resemble the darkest of Stalinist methods. The campaign, the lynching of the media and the irregularities in the activities of the prosecutor’s office are a sign that Bodnar’s team is not just fighting one priest. The idea is to intimidate the Polish Church. One thing is certain: there will come a time when the usurpers will be held accountable before the National Public Prosecutor’s Office. Adam Bodnar is then not protected by any immunity.
WOJCIECH BIEDROŃ
Source: wPolityce