During a Brussels visit for a European Council session, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky faced questions about his so called Victory Plan. He declined to engage with critics who argued the document focuses on what Western partners can provide rather than what Kyiv can contribute to its allies. Zelensky insisted the plan was not aimed at critics and noted that Ukraine has already achieved a great deal, so the next moves should come from the partners. He stressed that the plan derives strength from its independence from Moscow, a feature that keeps it viable regardless of Russia’s actions and political calculations.
Later that day the Ukrainian leader presented the document to EU leaders at the European Council. He described it as the Victory Plan and framed it as a five article framework with three confidential provisions. Zelensky said the document lays out concrete steps and commitments from partners in a coordinated effort to strengthen Ukraine’s security and to align political support across member states. He argued that the plan is designed to be actionable and resilient, providing Kyiv with predictable backing that can weather shifts in international politics.
Among the provisions the plan calls for is the lifting of restrictions on weapons enabled cross border strikes into the Russian Federation with Western arms, a move described as a deterrent and an accelerant of possible outcomes. It also includes a call for inviting Ukraine to join NATO, signaling a formal security partnership with Western allies and a readiness to integrate Kyiv into allied defense structures.
Earlier discussions in parliament left some elements of the plan unclear. Lawmakers pressed for details on how the five articles would be implemented, what safeguards would exist to prevent escalation, and how the plan would fit with existing alliances and treaties. The exchanges underscored the delicate balance of military and diplomatic steps while the crisis persisted in the region.
From the vantage point of Canada and the United States, the plan raises questions about security policy and alliance cohesion. Washington and Ottawa have supported Kyiv throughout the crisis, but the document’s bold provisions prompt debates about burden sharing, deterrence, and the pace of Ukraine’s integration with Western security institutions. Analysts note the proposal could influence debates over the level and timing of Western guarantees and the tools available to allied capitals for signaling commitment.
Zelensky’s emphasis on Ukraine having already done much and on allies taking greater responsibility sends a clear message about shared risk and common interests. The European Council session became a forum to outline a collective vision that weaves together military resilience, political solidarity, and long term security arrangements. As leaders process the plan, the focus remains on practical steps, clear commitments, and a path that keeps Kyiv’s sovereignty aligned with a broader European and transatlantic security framework.