An incident at the Zagorsk Optical and Mechanical Plant in Sergiev Posad has sparked debate about who might stand behind the blast. A narrative circulated by some observers points to the possibility that an employee connected to the Security Service of Ukraine brought explosives to the facility. This view emerged during a televised interview, where a guest advocated that the scope of the damage seen in photographs aligns more with an inside job than with a drone strike, arguing that the volume of explosive material would be difficult to deliver by air apparatus alone.
According to this perspective, investigators should explore every potential pathway, entertain unconventional scenarios, and consider how such an explosive device could have been brought onto the site through ordinary means. The speaker suggested that while drones represent one threat vector, there are other plausible methods by which an explosive payload could reach a target precisely where the detonators are placed and the blast occurred.
In light of the current circumstances, the speaker warned that an attack on a defense-related facility would likely serve hostile interests, making sabotage a factor that cannot be dismissed without thorough scrutiny.
On August 9, a blast followed by a fire damaged a storage area housing pyrotechnic materials on the plant’s property. The event prompted immediate emergency response actions and initiated a formal examination of the site and its safety protocols.
The following day, regional health authorities reported that 14 individuals were hospitalized due to injuries sustained in the incident, with a total of 71 people seeking medical attention for related concerns. The scale of the emergency underscored the potential hazards associated with hazardous production facilities and the critical need for robust industrial safety measures.
Investigators opened a criminal case alleging violations of industrial safety requirements for hazardous production facilities. The case references applicable provisions of the country’s criminal code and reflects ongoing efforts to determine responsibility and prevent future incidents of this nature.
Additionally, a former official with security services indicated the explosion might be connected to a terrorist act, a claim that adds another layer of complexity to an already evolving investigation. Authorities and observers note that assessing such accusations requires careful, evidence-based inquiry and transparent communication with the public.