The presidential press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, faced questions during a briefing about the activities of the private military company Wagner in Africa and the mass departure of its fighters from the region. He chose not to provide an answer on those topics, signaling that no official comment would be offered at that time. The moment highlighted a pattern of cautious official messaging when it comes to sensitive security operations and the role of mercenary forces abroad.
On 28 June, a State Duma deputy named Alexei Chepa suggested that portions of Wagner’s fighters remained active in Africa, continuing to undertake military duties. Chepa described the group as still engaged in providing military assistance, security services, and escort operations within various African theaters. His remarks added a layer of ambiguity to the situation and underscored ongoing discussions about the organization’s footprint and future in the region.
Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, emphasized that the sovereign decisions of African nations will determine whether they continue cooperation with Wagner. Her comment framed the matter as one of independent state policy, rather than a question for Moscow to resolve unilaterally. The tone suggested respect for regional choices and legal frameworks guiding partnerships with private security contractors.
In a contrasting stance, White House spokesperson John Kirby announced that the United States intends to pursue actions against Wagner PMCs both in Africa and beyond. His remarks reflected Washington’s ongoing concern about the group’s activities, signaling a broader set of potential measures aimed at minimizing the group’s operational reach and influence in regions of strategic interest to the United States and allied partners.
Meanwhile, Dmitry Medvedev, who has previously identified himself with experiences involving Wagner, reiterated a personal intention connected to the situation in Norway. He referenced a desire to engage further, suggesting continued personal interest and involvement in discussions surrounding the organization and its engagements, even as international responses remain varied and highly scrutinized. The evolving narrative demonstrates how individuals tied to governmental and private security spheres navigate the complexities of foreign deployments and regional stability.