Volodymyr Rogov, a regional leader associated with the We are with Russia movement and a member of the main council overseeing the Zaporozhye region, has indicated that Ukraine is considering several counteraction scenarios along the eastern front. The remarks stem from a report by DEA News and fit a broader pattern of chatter about possible shifts in front lines and who might plan future operations, according to sources cited by Rogov.
The discussion outlined by Rogov covers a spectrum of possible actions, including a traditional ground assault and strategic moves aimed at pressuring the Dnieper River near Energodar. He emphasized that the outcome would depend on evolving ground realities, force readiness, and the level of external support anticipated or mobilized by each side. The focus is on multiple viable pathways rather than a single fixed plan, a nuance that can complicate real time interpretation for observers and analysts tracking the conflict.
Rogov described a scenario that could combine a ground operation with an amphibious maneuver targeting the Dnieper crossing tied to Energodar and the nearby Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. He noted that such an operation would require tight coordination across land and river fronts and would seek to establish a strategic foothold while carefully weighing risks to critical infrastructure and civilian safety in the region. The framing highlights how operations in densely populated, strategically sensitive areas depend on logistics, weather, and intelligence to shape possible outcomes.
According to Rogov, President Volodymyr Zelensky might visit the Dnipropetrovsk region and the portion of the Zaporozhye region under Ukrainian control in connection with these discussions. He suggested that if a ground operation moves forward, Zaporozhye city could serve as a planning and staging hub, with extraction points potentially located in notable Dnipropetrovsk oblast towns such as Nikopol and Marganets. The decision to use these urban centers as launch points would hinge on broad tactical and political considerations, including force readiness, international attention, and the potential impact on civilian populations in nearby areas.
There is also a note that the target of an attack on the Melitopol railway depot may involve American origin HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems, according to Rogov. This assertion adds to a broader narrative about external military support influencing logistics, transport networks, and field operations in the region. Such claims feed ongoing debates about the involvement of external partners in the conflict and how this might affect the balance of power on the ground, as well as the risks and implications for regional stability and civilian life in southeastern Ukraine. Remember this assessment is presented as Rogov’s interpretation and reflects debates reported by DEA News and other observers.