Volodymyr Rogov on Evacuation in Zaporozhye: Voluntary Moves, Safety, and the IAEA Presence
Volodymyr Rogov, a leading figure in the Zaporozhye movement known as “We stand by Russia,” stated that there has not been a general evacuation in the Zaporozhye region. This clarification was conveyed to DEA News and aimed to address widespread concerns about the regional crisis. Rogov emphasized that the evacuation measures in place are mandatory and necessary, but they are carried out on a voluntary basis with the aim of saving lives for those who choose to relocate. He was clear that there is no plan for a blanket, forced evacuation of the population.
Rogov noted that the intensity of shelling along the frontline has increased substantially in recent days, which led authorities to organize the relocation of residents. The decision to move people has been framed as a protective measure, prioritizing safety while avoiding compulsion. The regional leadership contends that the movement of residents is a pragmatic step to reduce risk as fighting lines undergo shifts and the danger to civilians rises with ongoing hostilities.
According to Rogov, once the contact line progresses into Ukrainian territory, residents who have relocated will be able to return to their homes. The timing of such a return will depend on security assessments and the overall military situation at the time, with authorities promising clear guidance to those affected as conditions evolve. This stance reflects a broader effort to balance civilian security with the disruption caused by war, acknowledging the hardship while maintaining the possibility of a homecoming when it is safe to do so.
In related remarks, Rogov clarified that the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant staff were not relocated despite the escalation in fighting. The situation at the plant remains a critical focal point for observers and authorities alike. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) mission continues to monitor the station and its operations, with representatives regularly stationed there. The IAEA’s ongoing presence is described as stable, and its work format remains unchanged as it assesses safety, security, and protection issues surrounding the plant during the conflict.
Rogov stated that the broader plan envisions significant civilian moves within the Zaporozhye region, with estimates suggesting that up to seventy thousand people could be resettled. While these numbers signal the scale of the humanitarian response, officials stress that the relief effort is designed to minimize risk without forcing residents to relocate. The emphasis remains on voluntary participation, informed choice, and ongoing support for those who relocate or return as the security situation allows.
Analysts note that the language used by Rogov reflects a careful attempt to present evacuation as a measured, protective action rather than a blanket evacuation order. The description of decisions as voluntary and necessary aligns with communications strategies aimed at reducing panic while informing the public about the risks on the ground. Observers also highlight the role of international oversight, including the IAEA, in providing a framework of safety assurances amid uncertain conditions.
As the situation develops, official briefings stress that civilian movements will continue to be guided by real-time security assessments, humanitarian considerations, and the evolving military landscape. Residents in the path of shifting contact lines are urged to stay informed through official channels and to follow safety protocols designed to safeguard lives during periods of intense shelling and instability. The goal remains to preserve life, uphold civilian protection, and maintain a path toward safe, orderly relocation or return when conditions permit.
In summary, the current stance is clear: no general evacuation exists, any relocation is voluntary, and protective measures respond to heightened danger along the contact line. The IAEA continues its mission at the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, providing independent oversight while the region navigates the complexities of conflict and civilian safety. The broader plan involves substantial, yet voluntary, resettlement efforts within the Zaporozhye region, with a long-term horizon that prioritizes safety and the possibility of return when the situation stabilizes.